I suspect they will put the money into stocks which most likely will not ensure your original stake is 100% safe.
Really ? Ask Gay Byrne why he is working in his 80's.That's a crazy statement.
Check out the fact sheet
There countless examples where of where the investment has not recovered after 5 years, especially in Europe.That's a crazy statement. The OP's time horizon is 5 years plus. Even if he/she went in at the peak in '07/'08 and suffered the full decline in the value of his/her investments, he/she would be comfortably in positive territory after 5 years.
There countless examples where of where the investment has not recovered after 5 years, especially in Europe.
Right. I guess we are talking about different things. I would think that after five years the investment will probably retain its value. But its not certain and there are many example of indexes being down five or ten years on. If one really needs the money in five years it shouldn't be on stocks.Elcato's statement is not accurate. Equally the specifics you cite do not support his/her contention. It is not right to say that €100 put into equities for at least five years will "most likely" not return €100. Talking about Gay Byrne's experiences is just scaremongering. His issues were due to investing in leveraged investments and concentration risk (e.g. investment in Irish bank shares).
I'm not sure which one you refer to but there are countless stories of alleged (get rich quick) schemes out there which did not return their initial funds. Being lazy, I am not going to go looking for the threads here right now. However I am guilty of putting all non-bank accounts into the same bucket and I will bow to your greater knowledge on those. Btw I am not saying that banks are 100% going to return either just more likely imo.Elcato's statement is not accurate.
yes thank you for that, i presume your talking about zurich here when you mention pathway 4, if you could recommend any other companys please get backYou could always consider doing more than one thing. There are two separate elements to your question. Firstly a lump sum that you are confident you will not need for 5 years. Secondly a monthly amount that you can save. You would like to earn something on both and feel like you are getting a return. At the moment cash savings will not return much. You will have your lump sum at the end of five years but the value of it will have eroded somewhat due to inflation.
You could consider doing different things with the different elements. As you are not comfortable to risk the lump sum you could deposit that in a fixed term account, obviously choosing the best return you can obtain. With the monthly savings you could opt to put it all into a regular savings account, opt to put it into an investment account or split the amount in two and put half into a regular savings account and half into a more risky investment. That way you will not be risking your lump sum but will be increasing your chances of gaining a better return.
I would suggest that Pathway 6 is probably far too risky for you. Pathway 4 would be a better option.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?