Anyone reading his comments yesterday about how bad teachers are effectively protected for life whatever the level of performance. I loved the trade union response which pointed out that there was a system in place whereby teachers who were experiencing professional difficulties could make a dignified exit. Over the past decade, more than 1,000 teachers have taken early retirement under this scheme. So basically after years and years of sub-standard peformance they can take early retirement on full pensions. Thats really showing them!
I think teaching is a very difficult profession and like Peter Sutherland I think they should be well paid to attract the right people and unlike alot of people I don't begrudge them long holidays but I also expect them to be professionally capable and not like some the teachers I experienced in school.
So basically after years and years of sub-standard peformance they can take early retirement on full pensions. Thats really showing them!
Are you saying that they should forfeit the pensions to which they have contributed during their years of service to date? I don't think you would see this happening in any private sector case.
My point is that Sutherland is right to point out that unions and governments have protected under-performing teachers to the detriment of students and other teachers for decades. We wouldn't let sub-standard doctors treat our children so why do we let sub-standard teachers teach them.
Students are a mixed bag, some are eager to learn, some are anti social, and some even violent. Teachers have to deal with a growing number of issues and cannot simply turn up and teach. there are plenty of duds, but I think teachers take more flak than they are due.
he told me he had highly resented our class for insinuating that he didnt understand the material and he was GLAD no one had achieved higher than a C.
If all teachers were doing their jobs right there would be little need for Grind Schools & Christmas & Easter Revision courses etc
...speaks more of his unsuitability as a teacher than his apparent comprehension difficulties really.
Sorry but completely disagree with this - grinds are just a result of the pressure on kids these days - as Sherman said there is this notion that if you're paying for grinds you're getting a better education - aboslute nonsense I'd say. In fact I'm pretty sure the stats back this up too.If all teachers were doing their jobs right there would be little need for Grind Schools & Christmas & Easter Revision courses etc
No but most private sector workers wouldn't be allowed build up massive defined benefit pensions throughout years of poor performance so they can depart with their dignity intact .
I disagree - the nature of people is that they feel that by paying for something, that something is inherently 'better' than the free alternative. Even if their kids go to a private, fee-paying school, some people will always pay through the nose for extra tuition etc. to give their kids what they see as an extra advantage.
Indeed, but are you seriously suggesting that teachers who are deemed to have performed poorly should lose their pension entitlements, as well as their jobs?
Indeed, but are you seriously suggesting that teachers who are deemed to have performed poorly should lose their pension entitlements, as well as their jobs?
How does one go about measuring the effectiveness of Teachers?
Where did I say that people should lose their pension entitlements that they built up?? I am pointing out that they shouldn't be in the job building up the pension entitlements if they are not up to it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?