WaterWater
Registered User
- Messages
- 501
I rang Mercer with a similar query about this and they refused point blank to talk to me saying that my company was the policyholder and as such would not discuss it with me. I always thought that it was linked to my pension in some way?
No generally, where there is PHI and/or Life Assurance, the cost of these risk benefits is not taken from the pension contributions. The costs are paid by the employer. All the benefits show on one benefit statement simply because one insurance company administration system is used to do all the calculations. Again if you look at the scheme rule book which would be available from the Trustee's this will clarify for sure.
My question is - is this benefit taken into account in the usual public/private sector wage comparisons bandied around this site and elsewhere?A lot of companies provide Permanent Health Insurance for their employees in case they can no longer work due to ill health.
We discovered recently that the Permanent Health Insurance attaching to Mrs. ParkLane's employment was in fact no cover at all.
The reason being that "twice her weekly social insurance benefit was to be deducted from the weekly Permanent Health Insurance payment". As twice the weekly Illness benefit is €408 it meant that Mrs. ParkLane had to be earning more than €408 per week before the Permanent Health Insurance kicked in.
Mrs. ParkLane had changed her employment to a 3 day week with a corresponding drop in pay. She had thought that the Permanent Health Insurance would allow for the fact that she was now only working a 3 day week and that it would be calculated on a Pro Rata basis. This was not the case.
The employers booklet that was given to her staff outlining the details of her Permanent Health Insurance was no more than a basic leaflet. When she asked, yes you guessed it, Mercer for a copy of the actual policy document to check the specifics she was told that as she was not the policy holder she could not see it.
We discovered recently that the Permanent Health Insurance attaching to Mrs. ParkLane's employment was in fact no cover at all.
The reason being that "twice her weekly social insurance benefit was to be deducted from the weekly Permanent Health Insurance payment". As twice the weekly Illness benefit is €408 it meant that Mrs. ParkLane had to be earning more than €408 per week before the Permanent Health Insurance kicked in.
Mrs. ParkLane had changed her employment to a 3 day week with a corresponding drop in pay. She had thought that the Permanent Health Insurance would allow for the fact that she was now only working a 3 day week and that it would be calculated on a Pro Rata basis. This was not the case.
The employers booklet that was given to her staff outlining the details of her Permanent Health Insurance was no more than a basic leaflet. When she asked, yes you guessed it, Mercer for a copy of the actual policy document to check the specifics she was told that as she was not the policy holder she could not see it.
I had a similar situation relating to a part time staff member who went on long term sick but when we looked to claim for her, it turned out she would not be entitled to anything. In effect, the scheme was of no practical benifit to any staff member even though we were continuing to pay the premiums for them, so we were wasting money and the company providing the scheme was getting income for an insurance policy that they would never have to pay out on. All a bit of a joke
I had a similar situation relating to a part time staff member who went on long term sick but when we looked to claim for her, it turned out she would not be entitled to anything. In effect, the scheme was of no practical benifit to any staff member even though we were continuing to pay the premiums for them, so we were wasting money and the company providing the scheme was getting income for an insurance policy that they would never have to pay out on. All a bit of a joke
While I agree with your core point, I just wanted to highlight that this valuable benefit applies to most private sector companies, and does not apply to public sector staff (a point that is overlooked in those public/private salary comparisions that get tossed around).Most companies advertise to their staff that they have a Permanent Health Insurance policy in place to cover them in the event of illness.
...I just wanted to highlight that this valuable benefit applies to most private sector companies...
Fair point - it is mostly white collar in my experience.Can you back up your assertion that most private sector companies offer Income Protection for their staff? In my experience it is limited to some, mostly white-collar employers. I've never come across a single building firm offering income protection cover to staff, or pub, or hotel, or restaurant...
I had a similar situation relating to a part time staff member who went on long term sick but when we looked to claim for her, it turned out she would not be entitled to anything. In effect, the scheme was of no practical benifit to any staff member even though we were continuing to pay the premiums for them, so we were wasting money and the company providing the scheme was getting income for an insurance policy that they would never have to pay out on. All a bit of a joke
I had a similar situation relating to a part time staff member who went on long term sick but when we looked to claim for her, it turned out she would not be entitled to anything. In effect, the scheme was of no practical benifit to any staff member even though we were continuing to pay the premiums for them, so we were wasting money and the company providing the scheme was getting income for an insurance policy that they would never have to pay out on. All a bit of a joke
All a bit of a joke
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?