Dr Strangelove
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,457
Whilst I agree that the SFT needs to be increased, I struggle to understand why a public servant (or private) would refuse a promotion - with a higher salary and a higher pension benefit- just because a small portion of the increased pension might be clawed back over a 20 year period.
OK, I'll rephrase. My pension will be less than half the average working wage and fully integrated into the state pension.Except you won't be working, you'll be retired...on an index linked pension. Comparing it to the average working wage is not a relevant comparison.
if only it wasnt the tax take from people like them that funded everything else....OK, I'll rephrase. My pension will be less than half the average working wage and fully integrated into the state pension.
If you are so adamant that improved pension arrangements for highly paid workers are beneficial, why not have the same zeal for those on average or lower wages.
My point is that highly skilled workers like consultants, will receive a very high wage. From that wage they can maximise the very generous tax relief for pensions. After that, if they are reasonably prudent, they can invest excess capital, from their post tax wages, in equities, or property, or whatever and create other income streams. They don't need even more help from the average working person, on average working wages.
There is no tax take from government employees, it's just a reduction in expenditureif only it wasnt the tax take from people like them that funded everything else....
That's quite the arithmetic gymnastics, one way of looking at but if that was the case you'd expect they would report it in that wayThere is no tax take from government employees, it's just a reduction in expenditure
Very relevant to the Irish debate if the UK will continue to basically have no SFT.Labour has abandoned plans to bring back the pensions lifetime allowance, in an £800mn U-turn which will be welcomed by wealthier savers including hospital consultants and headteachers.
Rachel Reeves, shadow chancellor, has dropped the proposal from Labour’s election manifesto, to be published on Thursday, because it would add uncertainty for savers and be complex to reintroduce, her allies told the Financial Times.
And they have ISAs as well.From the FT (paywalled):
Very relevant to the Irish debate if the UK will continue to basically have no SFT.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?