P
patkeeno said:Surely that would be grossly unfair.
patkeeno said:Yes – but there were two parties to this arrangement, and the employer was more culpable than the employee.
Picture the scene, a high tech company, in the dark old 80's, young grunt fresh out of college, his first suit, told this is the way they get paid, everyone get paid this way - So you expect him to blow the whistle on this evil, despicable, unpatriotic practice - giza break
Does that include me? In actual fact, I agree with every word you wrote and have argued similarly on many occasions on these pages. What I said above referred to patkeano's query as to what Revenue would do if approached by a PAYE employee confessing to full or partial complicity in a tax scam dating back many years. Confronted with such a situation, I believe that the Revenue officials concerned would be obliged to follow the letter of the law in investigating the confession. Whether they would, or indeed should on the other hand actively seek out hidden scams of this nature dating back 15-20 years, in the absence of specific new evidence, is another matter entirelyIt gives me a right pain in the jacksie when I see what our 'Super' Moderators attitude to tax evasion in the past was.
ubiquitous said:Does that include me? In actual fact, I agree with every word you wrote and have argued similarly on many occasions on these pages.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?