Yeah, it's great isn't it. Mentioned it to my girlfriend last night. She didn't seem to share my excitement.
The prospective winner for this weekend's Open could come from a group of more than 10 players, and could be won by someone outside of that group.
I've no time for golf but think betting on it is a mugs game.
I've backed
Harrington 20/1
McDowell 35/1
Fowler 40/1
Moliniari 45/1
Dufner 55/1
Furyk 55/1
all win-only
The problem with this approach, as far as I can see, is that by backing 6 different players to win is that you are essentially cutting your potential winnings in each by a third - let me try to explain. If you bet a euro on each, then if Harrington comes in you will win 20 euro minue the 6 you have put in. In that case you are really getting Harrington at 3/1 right up to Furyk at 9/1 (55/6) which doesn't look as attractive. I could have this all wrong but that's what it looks like to me...
Already looks like this could turn into quite a shootout. Tiger Woods, Bubba Watson, Adam Scott and Graeme McDowell all leading the way - 3 former major winners and one who has come close a lot of times. Should be a good 4 days!
My wife said to me that she could win the open this year, but I said 'Your handy with an iron alright, but your drivings crap'..
what's her grip like?
Absolutely but at the end of the day, profit is the name of the game.
Each to their own however
I prefer to put my lucky fiver on outcomes that are more predictable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?