DrMoriarty
Moderator
- Messages
- 5,173
It goes back to the 15th century. See here.Is "horse dancing" an Olympic sport?
Just spotted what for me is the biggest joke event of the whole thing - "race walking"!!??
Thanks to technology like Sky+ boxes with High Definition picture that can be paused and played in slow motion, can see that almost every stride they take involves them being momentarily off the ground... therefore they're not walking, they're running. Which pretty much renders the entire event pointless.
There are judges around the course to inspect whether or not you lose contact with the ground (as the Irish competitor found out to his cost). Wouldn't be my favourite sport but I definitely wouldn't consider it a joke.
Let me explain.There are too many swimming medals anyway.
Let me explain.
Backstroke, Breaststroke, Butterfly, Freestyle and Medley
Why not have on the track, Running Backwards, Running with Arms Folded, Egg and Spoon, Sack Race and of course Medley.
There are judges around the course to inspect whether or not you lose contact with the ground (as the Irish competitor found out to his cost). Wouldn't be my favourite sport but I definitely wouldn't consider it a joke.
Yes, Gianni missed the point completely. He fails to understand that AAM posters will obviously know more about most issues than the full-time professionals who have devoted their entire lives to these issues. Why would the judges, or the competing walkers, or their coaches, or their families know more about this issue than a 'hurler on the ditch' AAM poster?I think you've missed my point there Gianni: it's irrelevant what the on-course judges spot, or more importantly, fail to spot. You me and the dogs on the street with a remote control to hand can clearly see that some/all of the competitors are not in fact walking. Therefore the event is a nonsense.
For example I slowed down the last 5 mins of the womens 20k race this evening, and both of the Russian ladies (the top 2) could clearly be seen to be off the ground on pretty much every stride - they were running. How do you deal with that?
Yes, Gianni missed the point completely. He fails to understand that AAM posters will obviously know more about most issues than the full-time professionals who have devoted their entire lives to these issues. Why would the judges, or the competing walkers, or their coaches, or their families know more about this issue than a 'hurler on the ditch' AAM poster?
Let me explain.
Backstroke, Breaststroke, Butterfly, Freestyle and Medley
Why not have on the track, Running Backwards, Running with Arms Folded, Egg and Spoon, Sack Race and of course Medley.
So judges, and by extension umpires and referees and all other sporting officials, don't make errors then?
Video evidence has highlighted numerous error and mistakes made by officials in several sports so why would walking be any different?
Genetics? Evolution? Specialisation in a country where sprinting is THE sport? (And agree with Sunny re Carl Lewis - really, he feels fit to cast aspersions?)but I also have this niggling feeling that Carl Lewis is right, how can a nation of 2.7M people be so dominant in the sprints.
It's not an error. The rules clearly state it has to be obvious to the naked eye that the two feet are leaving the ground. Not on slow motion on sky plus.
Perhaps because they feel that important decisions about the sport should be made by people who know and understand the sport, rather than armchair experts armed with their Sky remote?And why do the rules state that?
Let me explain.
Backstroke, Breaststroke, Butterfly, Freestyle and Medley
Why not have on the track, Running Backwards, Running with Arms Folded, Egg and Spoon, Sack Race and of course Medley.
Perhaps because they feel that important decisions about the sport should be made by people who know and understand the sport, rather than armchair experts armed with their Sky remote?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?