E
That's a great document there shnaek "speculative resources" "seawater extraction". Sounds fab. Except the speculative resources haven't been found and the seawater extraction has only been achieved in a test tube.Here's an article you might be interested in reading:
http://www.nea.fr/html/pub/newsletter/2002/20-2-Nuclear_fuel_resources.pdf
This suggests we have enough nuclear fuel resources to last for millenia.
Price at $135 today, risen 20% in May alone. Price will be way over $200 by 2016! Could easily see $150 by end of summer, if not more. We have a big problem until a solution is found, as was pointed out on this thread, it would take a huge amount of nuclear power plants to fill the oil gap, with possible uranium shortages etc. Its clear Ireland needs at least one reactor, (in Enfield preferably.)
You left out one very important factor causing it to rise higher the massive demand from China / India etc. Its all just a witches brew ready to boil over.
I still dont believe it will fall back to $100 in short - medium term, we'll just have to wait and see.
That's a great document there shnaek "speculative resources" "seawater extraction". Sounds fab. Except the speculative resources haven't been found and the seawater extraction has only been achieved in a test tube.
Here's another site:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-climate_change_debate/2587.jsp
that says that current known reserves will give current reactors 40-50 years more fuel. Reprocessing and MOX reactors will extend that. But try adding in the 80+% of world power that isn't nuclear. Then add in future expansion. Then add in all the other things that are liquid or gas fuel powered (other than electricity generation) and you end up with a lifespan of 10-20 years for known fuel reserves.
Wanna guess how expensive uranium will be when we hit peak uranium???
This whole thread has highlighted some interesting issues. My earlier post said that uranium would last for millions of years, clearly i was wrong, and have been corrected.
A couple of hundred years from now (give or take), there will no fossil fuels and no nuclear power. Our future descendents will have to do with Wind, solar, hydro and a few other weak energy sources. Definitely not enough to satisfy a population of probably 100 billion people by then.
The world’s population has doubled in the last 25 years, and considering most of the underdeveloped world are multiplying rapidly, it will double again and again and again. Currently the population of the world is increasing by nearly 2 million a week. India alone is increasing by 17 million a year.
It points to a Malthusian catastrophe in the future as the production and delivery of food is totally dependent on cheap readily available energy.
It's a bubble, and it will collapse-just like property.
It's a bubble, and it will collapse-just like property. It's the same cycle which happens over and over again. We have a boom, then we have a bust. The bust starts with Equity, then Property, and then Commodities. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again. Oil will be back around $100 by Christmas. You can come back here and kiss my feet then.
So, when top oil guys dont know for certain and have conflicting opinions,
just adds to uncertainty.
No, it all doesn't add up. There is a queue of 'bad events' waiting to unfold...The only event to push price down, would be if they put an end to futures contracts, and this is unlikely, I'd say over 170 by December -
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?