There is no time limit on Revenue's side.How are revenue raising an assessment for 2019 now? That's outside the 4-year time limit?
I heard of yet another case bad data from Welfare today. This time on the Contributory State Pension data supplied to Revenue they pulled an extra 200 euro out of thin air.
The fundamental principle of the the income tax system is of self-assessment, with the onus on the individual taxpayer to ensure that they have paid the correct amount of tax. This onus is not displaced in the case of PAYE-only taxpayers, who are still responsible for ensuring that they have neither overpaid nor underpaid their tax.As a general principle the state shouldn’t be seeking tax with unreasonable delay.
Four years is ridiculous and suggests a big failure in public administration.
There is no time limit on Revenue's side.
I heard of yet another case bad data from Welfare today. This time on the Contributory State Pension data supplied to Revenue they pulled an extra 200 euro out of thin air.
There actually is a time limit on the Revenue side - in the case of a person other than a chargeable person, section 959AB TCA 1997 provides a strict four-year time limit from the end of the year of assessment, other than in cases of fraud or neglect.
Tell me how it constitutes fraud or neglect on the part of a PAYE employee or pensioner to marginally underpay income tax on pension or benefits income where Revenue and the DSP can't get their act together to communicate the relevant details to each other within 4 years of the tax year end.In other words there is no limit. As the Revenue like to point out, ignorance is not an excuse.
With respect, I think I can safely say that I have substantially more experience of dealing with arguments about the meaning of those words than you do, and my advice to the OP stands.In other words there is no limit. As the Revenue like to point out, ignorance is not an excuse.
Communications of relevant details is only a relatively new phenomenon. Since Revenue's own IT staff moved into positions of management.Tell me how it constitutes fraud or neglect on the part of a PAYE employee or pensioner to marginally underpay income tax on pension or benefits income where Revenue and the DSP can't get their act together to communicate the relevant details to each other within 4 years of the tax year end.
I expect you'll struggle.
That underlines rather than detracts from my point. That said, it's really a minor issue.Communications of relevant details is only a relatively new phenomenon. Since Revenue's own IT staff moved into positions of management.
Think of all the years were people on both State and Personal pensions were not properly taxed at all.
I would like to hear your views on Revenue's taxation of Kerry Co-Op shares.With respect, I think I can safely say that I have substantially more experience of dealing with arguments about the meaning of those words than you do, and my advice to the OP stands.
I'm not sure what that has to do with this thread?I would like to hear your views on Revenue's taxation of Kerry Co-Op shares.
The arrival of Income Tax bills for previous years from Revenue, out of the blue.I'm not sure what that has to do with this thread?
Which, to the best of my knowledge were within the applicable 4-year time limit as the affected dairy farmers were Form 11 filers. I'm still not clear how a segue into talking about that is relevant to this thread?The arrival of Income Tax bills for previous years from Revenue, out of the blue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?