Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,759
They might all target low six month- one year fixed rates. In effect offering discount rates before the mortgage holder is faced with high renewal rates/variable rates.
Whereas improving the information the customer has to compare the total cost feels like a stronger approach.
First of all, I think that cash back should be banned. Providing more information that someone will pay a lot more over the next 20 years, does not fix the problem. Most people can't evaluate the information. And cash back is not about individual decisions. It's a device to keep the rates for the existing customer high.
is helpful, whether or not cashback is banned.
- 2.9% fixed for 30 years. No cashback and a total expected repayment of [€450k]
- 3.1% fixed for 30 years. With 2% cashback and a total repayment of [€462k]
I favour estimating the interest rate difference between given lenders over the last several years and using this difference as the basis for projections. And you would be forbidden from using "new customers only" rates for this purpose.
I don't think individual projections are needed. You could just calculate projections for a set of representative mortgage balances and LTV ratios (and whether or not the borrower is eligible for a green mortgage).While I see the merit in it, it would be way too complex for an individual projection. And brokers and bankers would just say "Oh yes, BoI were dearer but they have changed their strategy. What matters is the rate you are fixing at today... "
I will attempt to do this. It would be useful information to have.But maybe Askaboutmoney could compile a table of the historic rates for a standard product e.g. <90% , 5 year fixed €200k mortgage.
If future projections were based on the lenders' historical rates, it would be hard for them to game the system, I would have thought?You'd want to avoid lenders gaming the system.
I feel that the information presented could be better – and "total projected cost of mortgage" is better than interest rates because very few people are able to quantify what a 0.3% difference means over the long term (whether or not cashback is banned).The information given at present is very good. But most people don't understand it. And as Paul said "when people hear nine grand cash back, they stop comparing"
But there is a fair chance that cashback will not be banned, and so I feel that providing more information along the lines of:
What was in McGrath's bill?Michael McGrath produced a Bill when he was in opposition which passed the first stage in the Dáil. Paschal Donohoe and the Dept of Finance and Central Bank snuffed it out. Michael McGrath is now the Minister for Finance so I think we have a good chance of getting my proposals through. My proposals are less interventionist than McGrath's.
There are certainly such people but I wonder what proportion of all borrowers they are? That's probably very difficult to know.What about people for whom the cashback is not a ruse or a scam?
People who understand that it’s more expensive, but specifically plan to use the cashback to, say, buy furniture or buy a kitchen.
I agree with this. But if the Central Bank continues to allow dual pricing and cashback, we should still try to design a clearer style of information.The Central Bank believes that it's ok to provide information and then everything is fine. It's used as an excuse to avoid taking action to really protect consumers.
I presume it's somewhere here?What was in McGrath's bill?
In that case they are presumably at the tipping point of taking on debt that is not sustainable for their personal circumstances, so they should really be thinking twice about doing so?Hi Brendan,
A lot of times they can’t. I know people who know exactly how the rates work but happily take the €15,000 or so.
Gordon
@Paul FWhat was in McGrath's bill?
However, Michael McGrath now intends to proceed with two other aspects of the Bill and hopes that they can become law before the end of the year [2017]. These would not be delayed by the economic analysis.
- a prohibition on lenders discriminating between new and existing borrowers
- A ban on cash back offers
Not necessarily. The Central Bank rules are quite strict, some would say overly strict.In that case they are presumably at the tipping point of taking on debt that is not sustainable for their personal circumstances, so they should really be thinking twice about doing so?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?