Re: Caravans.
michaelm
Your differentiation is a red herring on two counts:
1.The point I'm trying to make is that prejudicial comments based on ethnicity (or plenty of other bases) IS just as serious as those based on racism. The situation re the Jews in Germany or the Yugoslavian atrocities, the displacement of the (travelling!!) Roma people in Romania are all ethnic issues, not racist ones but it certainly doesn't make any difference to how wrong they were.
2. The terms "race" and "ethnicity" are almost interchangeable in many dictionaries. Certainly the dividing line is not as clear as you seem to think - see
Cambridge Dictionaries Online, for example. Hopefully one day the word "race" will be obsolete when everyone realises we are part of the
human race (note different use of term!) and that differentiating people on the basis of some kind of skin colour scale or jaw line is a pretty pathetic in the first instance. As I've already said, the term "race" itself can be seen as offensive.
Rainyday's supportive comments nothwithstanding, I'm truly disgusted by the original comments and concerned at yours (and presumably lots of others', including perhaps the moderators, it would seem) belief that they are somehow allowable. I really do believe they should be censored since remarks targeted at a group on the basis of their sex, skin colour, disabled, sexuality would simply not be tolerated on AAM and rightly so.
Rebecca
PS If they are censored, then I'm quite happy to have my comments erased too in the interest of returning the thread to it's original topic. By the way, I'd go for a caravan every time. I have even bought one for my sister from travellers - it's a really good tip. Since travellers use their caravans as a home, they are often the best kept, best maintained, best kitted-out.