145k is the amount of mortgage being looked for? Or am I reading it differently to everyone else? I didn't read it as though they already had an existing mortgage of that amount.
Other than that if you just don't fit bank criteria based on income at the moment there is not much you can do, have you tried UB? I do see where PTSB are coming from too, you have to be able to borrow sufficient to finish the house, nothing worse than unfinished property and inability to borrow more to complete, both bank and you are stuck if that sort of situation arises, surprised the others didn't flag that one too or did you have to provide architects/engineers estimate of cost yet?
Self builds always cost more than you think and getting it completely finished on that budget is tight and you won't have sufficient income left over on a monthly basis to be able to finish it off bit by bit, which banks don't like anyway, they want a mortgage on a completed property.
PTSB said that in their opinion we weren't asking for enough money to complete the build
What did the PTSB base this on? Presumably as they are in the business of lending to self build's they have a fair idea of the current price for building. Are you sure your figures are correct?
LDFerguson, if the supervising architect reduced the features a little & removed the contingency from the quote, giving a figure of 120K or so, do you think pTSB would go for it then? (120K + 20% contingency = 144K)
LDFerguson, if the supervising architect reduced the features a little & removed the contingency from the quote, giving a figure of 120K or so, do you think pTSB would go for it then? (120K + 20% contingency = 144K)
The supervising architect initially put a build cost of €120,000 on the property. This included 10% contingency. However the mortgage adviser recommended he increase this amount.
PTSB always require a borrower to qualify for 20% more than what they're looking for on a self-build.
It's debatable that 20% may be too high a figure for contingency but that's what PTSB want.
I think that is prudent lending. And based on anything I've ever renovated etc 20% would be a good figure. Never ever have I seen anybody come in below, never mind within budget.
I agree with the prudence, but what happens in practice is often that an experienced architect and/or QS will add a realistic contingency margin into the estimate...and then a little bit more for prudence at their end...and then PTSB will come along and seek an additional 20% on top of all that again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?