Previous poster is correct. We work in this area. The so-named "mortage-protection" policy is issued by a life insurance company and pays out on the death of the borrower with the term of the policy (co-inciding with mortgage term). Such cover can also be bought to pay out in the event of critical illness.
The confusingly titled "Mortage-repayment-protection policy" pays out genearlly on loss of job or serious disbabilty.
As a principle, insurance companies, either general or life insurance do not pay out on events that are under the control of the insured person, or which they can reasonably be expected to forsee and avoid.
As such voluntary redundancy is excluded, and we have seen specific case histories on this point.
This brings us to two key points. A redundancy happening shortly after the policy starts will be veiwed supiciously by the calims dept. in an insurance company, and will be chceked diligently before pay-out.
Is redundancy voluntary or forced ? In most cases there will be public knowledge of voluntary redunancy programs in particular businesses.
In a smaller organisation, the point could be debatable, but employers open themselves up to a potential minefield of litigation against themselves, from State agencies, insurance companies, and the redundant person themselves, if they were to wrongly certify the nature of the redundancy on a claim form.
No joy for you here, but I hope the extra detail assists your understanding on the topic.