I am torn between 2 quotes. My loan to value that i need is somewhere in the region of 66% to 76% depending on how much renovation I do at the start.
Assuming 66%
Ulster bank offered me a 1.1% tracker for 40 years with a >60% LTV
0.95 tracker for 40 years with a <60% LTV
with a 1 year fixed rate (was stated at 3.2% before ECB increase) but I am guessing it will go up until I draw down on it.
Bank of scotland offered me a 1% tracker for 39 years with a >75% LTV
with a 2 year diso**** rate. Ill need to refer to the quotes to get the discount rate(not to hand).
Bank of scotland will offer me more money (in principle at least) 230k where as Ulster bank offered 209 on principle and came back with 200k limit.
Any taughts on how to compare. I was thinking that cost per thousand would be the best way as it took discount period and everything into account and lets me work out my monthly repayments easily. But bank of scotland cant provide this figure??
Assuming 66%
Ulster bank offered me a 1.1% tracker for 40 years with a >60% LTV
0.95 tracker for 40 years with a <60% LTV
with a 1 year fixed rate (was stated at 3.2% before ECB increase) but I am guessing it will go up until I draw down on it.
Bank of scotland offered me a 1% tracker for 39 years with a >75% LTV
with a 2 year diso**** rate. Ill need to refer to the quotes to get the discount rate(not to hand).
Bank of scotland will offer me more money (in principle at least) 230k where as Ulster bank offered 209 on principle and came back with 200k limit.
Any taughts on how to compare. I was thinking that cost per thousand would be the best way as it took discount period and everything into account and lets me work out my monthly repayments easily. But bank of scotland cant provide this figure??