Are you sure that this is correct?2. Income and expenditure
Annual gross income from employment or profession: €115,000
Monthly take-home pay: €5,000
Why would you do this when you can well afford to ride out variable rate fluctuations and would most likely pay more in the long term and have less flexibility with overpayments or early redemption on a long term fixed rate?Monthly repayment: €955 but will increase to €1,100 if I switch to a lender with a fixed rate of 3.7% for the lifetime of the mortgage
What charges apply to the DC pension and what is it invested in? These factors will have a significant bearing on returns. Why do you think that a PRSA is necessarily going to yield better returns?(i) I'm considering transferring my DC pension to a PRSA due to its lacklustre performance (5% p.a).
In general two priorities would normally be paying down debt (in your case your mortgage) and maximising pension contributions up to your age related tax relief limit (25% in your case and 30% in the year that you turn 50). But also don't live in penury in order to do these!(ii) What is the best way of maximising the value of my surplus cash to generate an income to supplement my DB pension if I retire between 55-60?
Investing long term directly in shares might be a better idea given the lower charges and taxes compared to unit linked funds or ETFs especially since you have a CGT loss to eventually write off.I'm not an experienced investor and would prefer to invest in a global index fund except for the 41% exit tax
The poor performance is because of the fund you are invested in, not the pension itself. You could get the same results in a PRSA. Under a PRSA, you have to have actually retired to access before age 60. With an occupational scheme, you just have to reach age 50. The scheme is almost certainly cheaper. Look at moving to an equity fund and leave it alone.11. What specific question do you have or what issues are of concern to you?
I have 4 questions;
(i) I'm considering transferring my DC pension to a PRSA due to its lacklustre performance (5% p.a). My objective is to achieve a higher growth rate and have access to the cash when I'm 60. Any significant drawbacks to this plan?
(ii) What is the best way of maximising the value of my surplus cash to generate an income to supplement my DB pension if I retire between 55-60? I'm not an experienced investor and would prefer to invest in a global index fund except for the 41% exit tax
(iii) Should I switch to a lender who is offering a 3.8% interest rate for the remaining life of the mortgage?
All feedback and advice welcome and appreciated
Mortgage on family home: €185,000
Cash: €50k Savings on deposit, rainy day fund €20k
I wish to retire between 55-60 and am currently buying notional years which will allow me to retire at 55 on a 3/4 pension.
My objective is to achieve a higher growth rate and have access to the cash when I'm 60.
Carrying CGT loss forward from sale of investment property bought in 2006
You really don't need to do anything other than pay down your mortgage. The pension income you have is more valuable to you if you have no debt to service.(ii) What is the best way of maximising the value of my surplus cash to generate an income to supplement my DB pension if I retire between 55-60? I'm not an experienced investor and would prefer to invest in a global index fund except for the 41% exit tax
BOI's variable rate is 4.15%. It may have been 3.3% when you fixed but it's highly unlikely that you are rolling onto a 3.3% variable rateType of interest rate: Fixed rate expiring in Oct 2024. Option to stay on 3.3% variable or switch to another lender
This doesn't add up for me. If you are saving €2k and currently have a mortgage of €1k, you are only living on €2k per month. Everything is that bit more expensive on your own so after all utilities and essentials that doesn't leave a lot to work with.Monthly take-home pay: €5,000
....
Saving circa €2,000 per month
Mortgage on family home: €185,000
This should be very straightforward.You have way too much cash on hand.Cash: €50k Savings on deposit, rainy day fund €20k
Thanks for clarifying.All, really appreciate the responses as I was feeling overwhelmed and was starting not to see the wood from the trees. Some other pertinent information;
Re lower take home pay; pension contributions are costing €1.2k per month and VHI also deducted
As I said before I don't see the need in your case (with generous disposable income and no dependents) to opt for a long term fixed rate when you can well afford to ride out any variable rate fluctuations and your variable rate seems competitive. In the long term you will generall pay less overall interest on a competitive variable rate versus a fixed rate.Re 3.8% mortgage: lender will allow overpayments up to 10% each year on the outstanding balance with no penalty and early redemption charge of 2%. Sounds like a good deal to me but maybe I'm missing something.
At your age my personal (non finance professional) opinion is that you should seriously consider being 100% in equities only.DC pension is invested 68% at Risk Level 5, 32% in Level 4. Both funds have mix of equities, bonds and property with low exposure to cash
If you have reduced or even cleared the mortgage by that stage then you can use the money for other purposes.Re retiring at 55 - I will get a capital lump sum which would in theory, pay off my outstanding mortgage. I don't know if this fact changes any of the above feedback
Technically yes but, as mentioned elsewhere, many non US investors don't let that trouble them.Just on BRK, I think it should be borne in mind that US estate tax may be relevant to any holding with a value over $60k.
I would disagree - the investment timeframe for a 48 year old could easily be 40 years and investments should reflect that.I would be inclined to keep the pension 100% in equities and keep any after-tax savings on deposit once the mortgage is cleared. At that stage, (early) retirement will be coming into view and I don’t think it’s wise to be 100% in equities in the run up to retirement.
If somebody is drawing down a portfolio evenly over 30 years starting at 55, then they have an investment horizon of 15 years - not 30 years.I would disagree - the investment timeframe for a 48 year old could easily be 40 years and investments should reflect that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?