mandelbrot
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,330
Well the company was audited by Revenue, so you'd imagine they satisfied themselves in relation to the other taxheads (or maybe not!).
Wasn't there an issue with him not paying into his employees pension fund as is required by law?How do we know the company paid its PAYE/PRSI in full? RCT too? CIF pension contribs?
For all we know they could have been underdeclared as well. He has prior for this sort of thing.
Wasn't there an issue with him not paying into his employees pension fund as is required by law?
Having said that, if someone can tell me definitively that the VAT wasn't accrued as a creditor on the company's accounts, then I'd have a very different opinion.
I'm no martyr. I am running a business and I make sure it pays its way. I never lost money on a job in my life but I try to run it in an honest fashion."
He now owns a small vineyard in Italy and hopes to soon sell wine from it in Dublin.
He also gives temporary accommodation to a Communist Party of Ireland bookshop
"I wouldn't be as well-off if I worked in a socialist system but I do believe that corporation tax should be higher,"
Some years ago, one of Dublin's biggest builders was given a stark example of this. Wallace did £170,000 worth of work for him but was only paid £150,000, a stunt the powerful builder was well-known for. After six months of legal action, Wallace's solicitor told him it would take two years to get to court and he'd be lucky to get £2,000.
"So I knew of a guy made a living out of a gun," he says. "I made contact with him and said ‘listen, there's a guy owes me £20,000 - will you get it for me?' He said he would give me £16,000 and keep £4,000."
"There was a guy working for the builder and I deliberately went for a pint with him," continues Wallace. "‘Did you hear I'm getting the money out of your boss?' I said to him. ‘I hired a hitman and he's going to get it. Don't tell anyone now.' Next day I got a phone call from the managing director. ‘Mr Wallace,' he says, ‘I believe there is a bit of a financial dispute on that job. Can we meet and talk about it?' I met them and they offered me £15,000. I said I'd take £16,000. Of course, I never would have dreamt of actually hiring the hitman. I only used him as leverage but it worked."
"I had my cap in hand begging the banks for money," he says. "It took me 18 months to get a bank to finance this and five refused me. I expected the AIB to finance it because I had a great relationship with them in Wexford for 15 years. I was brought into AIB headquarters to meet the top boys."
Back in Ormond Quay, Wallace caresses a huge boardroom table in a plush office lined with rows of fine Italian wine. Despite the plush décor and the sundrenched view of the Millennium Bridge, nothing quite catches the eye like Wallace's bright pink Palermo football jersey.
Also yesterday, Mr Wallace's company M&J Wallace, which is in receivership, was prosecuted at Dublin's District Court for allegedly taking workers' pension contributions from their wages but not paying them to the CWPS.
"I'm wrong to be paying late, but it's because of a dispute over how much is due. The delay is because of a discrepancy over the amount of money involved," he explained.
Having said that, if someone can tell me definitively that the VAT wasn't accrued as a creditor on the company's accounts, then I'd have a very different opinion.
Just some background to Mick Wallace:
http://www.businessandfinance.ie/index.jsp?p=413&n=427&a=2095
"I'm no martyr. I am running a business and I make sure it pays its way. I never lost money on a job in my life but I try to run it in an honest fashion."
OK, good to know, I don't really see what either of those bring to light?He also gives temporary accommodation to a Communist Party of Ireland bookshop
So, that would be what's known in business as diversification then. Also, it says Wallace himself owns it, so unless we're alleging other impropriety on his part, he financed it from his taxed income, at a time when the business was doing well."He now owns a small vineyard in Italy and hopes to soon sell wine from it in Dublin."
OK, that's how he feels about that."I wouldn't be as well-off if I worked in a socialist system but I do believe that corporation tax should be higher,"
Fair play to him for not lying down and being bullied. I wonder if any small suppliers of Dunnes Stores have ever considered taking out a hit on Margaret... I think the key point is that he didn't actually hire a hitman, but let them think he had, another area where there's a huge distinction.Some years ago, one of Dublin's biggest builders was given a stark example of this. Wallace did £170,000 worth of work for him but was only paid £150,000, a stunt the powerful builder was well-known for. After six months of legal action, Wallace's solicitor told him it would take two years to get to court and he'd be lucky to get £2,000.
"So I knew of a guy made a living out of a gun," he says. "I made contact with him and said ‘listen, there's a guy owes me £20,000 - will you get it for me?' He said he would give me £16,000 and keep £4,000."
"There was a guy working for the builder and I deliberately went for a pint with him," continues Wallace. "‘Did you hear I'm getting the money out of your boss?' I said to him. ‘I hired a hitman and he's going to get it. Don't tell anyone now.' Next day I got a phone call from the managing director. ‘Mr Wallace,' he says, ‘I believe there is a bit of a financial dispute on that job. Can we meet and talk about it?' I met them and they offered me £15,000. I said I'd take £16,000. Of course, I never would have dreamt of actually hiring the hitman. I only used him as leverage but it worked."
Hmmm big whoop-dee-do: "Bank executives meet businessman customer" - shocking headline!"I had my cap in hand begging the banks for money," he says. "It took me 18 months to get a bank to finance this and five refused me. I expected the AIB to finance it because I had a great relationship with them in Wexford for 15 years. I was brought into AIB headquarters to meet the top boys."
Yep, wasn't he doing well, like so many other businesses in a country that was booming... unless you're saying he bought all this stuff while things were going down the swanny then you can hardly say you find it surprising that he had a plush office, when his company was making millions in profits?Back in Ormond Quay, Wallace caresses a huge boardroom table in a plush office lined with rows of fine Italian wine. Despite the plush décor and the sundrenched view of the Millennium Bridge, nothing quite catches the eye like Wallace's bright pink Palermo football jersey.
When you read Mr. Nolans letter in todays Irish times, you begin to see why things like this will always happen.
[broken link removed]
So, what, you're comparing Mick to Charlie Haughey?
Or just commenting on the crazy attitude of Mr Nolan?
I don't think you can accuse other people of being naive when you are saying that he probably meant to pay the VAT eventually and accrued the liability on the company's balance sheet. As I said earlier, what accountant or auditor allowed a VAT liability to be put on the balance sheet for a couple years, see no payment or a large underpayment and then signs off on the accounts? Do you really believe he avoided VAT but kept his accounts true and fair?
And you've just proven my point, because I see audited accounts across my desk everyday, and I've seen cases identical to what I've described. So no, I'm not naive, I stand over what I said.
You are coming across as defending him,which may not be intentional.I can't believe I appear to be defending him, as I don't approve of his shenanigans at all, but seeing as I live in the real world, in an Ireland which is full of people who'll chance their arm...:
Just because we have an Ireland which is full of people who will chance their arms,does not make a discussion of the Mick Wallace issue irrelevant.
Id say you are very wrong there, as I have been on several other sites and listening to radio and Tv and social media and the majority are against this type of behaviour.I can't help but wonder about the naivety of some of the posters on here; it's either naivety or ye are all virtuous beyond all reproach. AAM posters clearly don't make for a representative sample of the general population!
You clearly think posters are naive and virtuous when they discuss an issue which is in the public domain,and is being discussed all over the media,I don't see what your problem is,if its that you dont like what your reading ,then dont read the posts,because that is how people feel and if you don't like it or choose to call us naive and virtuous perhaps start a new thread,like " say nothing about anyone,because everyone else is at it"!
Quite frankly what you have said above is a disgrace! Threatening people is not an answer,and next thing you know sure the milk man/mortgage providers/white van man/suppliers will be threatening to knee cap the customers who dont pay up,and then say "Only messing!!Fair play to him for not lying down and being bullied. I wonder if any small suppliers of Dunnes Stores have ever considered taking out a hit on Margaret... I think the key point is that he didn't actually hire a hitman, but let them think he had, another area where there's a huge distinction.
mandlebrot:Are you saying that what Mick Wallace did is the norm? Are you also saying that ,even though its illegal,that its happening everyday?And you've just proven my point, because I see audited accounts across my desk everyday, and I've seen cases identical to what I've described.
You say they cross your desk everyday, so you are aware of this type of trading? Are you obliged to report something like this when you know and have evidence that something illegal is being done?
If something crossed my desk everyday which I knew was someone chancing their arm,I would at the least feel obliged to report it.And if in a professional capacity,I would have thought you would be obliged to do the same,if that is the case.
Either way the fact that you say there are many more doing the same thing,makes it no less illegal.
No, I didn't say I see it every day! But I have seen it plenty of times, to varying degrees, in the If the VAT is accrued as part of the outstanding VAT creditor then the accounts are true and fair. It's only if the VAT isn't disclosed that the accounts may not be true and fair.So you have seen audited accounts everyday showing a company is deliberately not paying or under paying VAT because they cant afford it for a prolonged period of time with no note to the financial statements or comment from the auditor? And these companies are simply sticking an accrual on the balance sheet?
Who are you tellingMust make audits very easy for Revenue. Just ask for the balance sheet of every company and the avoidance of tax is there in black and white.
Oh I'm not saying that we shouldn't be discussing it - I'm really just trying to play devil's advocate here, and point out that the comparisons between him and Paul Begley are a bit wide of the mark.You are coming across as defending him,which may not be intentional.
Just because we have an Ireland which is full of people who will chance their arms,does not make a discussion of the Mick Wallace issue irrelevant.
Well obviously anyone talking in the mainstream media are going to be spitting vitriol (regardless of whether they actually couldn't care less), it's grist to their mill!Id say you are very wrong there, as I have been on several other sites and listening to radio and Tv and social media and the majority are against this type of behaviour.
You clearly think posters are naive and virtuous when they discuss an issue which is in the public domain,and is being discussed all over the media,I don't see what your problem is,if its that you dont like what your reading ,then dont read the posts,because that is how people feel and if you don't like it or choose to call us naive and virtuous perhaps start a new thread,like " say nothing about anyone,because everyone else is at it"!
The subtlety of the thing is going over your head! He never threatened anyone; he merely made a suggestion to someone, whom he was fairly sure would repeat the story. The power of suggestion...!Quite frankly what you have said above is a disgrace! Threatening people is not an answer,and next thing you know sure the milk man/mortgage providers/white van man/suppliers will be threatening to knee cap the customers who dont pay up,and then say "Only messing!!
mandlebrot:
Are you saying that what Mick Wallace did is the norm? Not the norm but it happens.
Are you also saying that ,even though its illegal,that its happening everyday? Again, it's not the norm, but I'd say at a very rough guess that at least 5% of companies have accrued undeclared taxes on their balance sheets, of varying levels of materiality.
You say they cross your desk everyday, so you are aware of this type of trading? Are you obliged to report something like this when you know and have evidence that something illegal is being done? You don't know what my job is, or in what capacity I'm looking at these things! I don't necessarily see a M&J Wallace situation everyday, but it does crop up.
If something crossed my desk everyday which I knew was someone chancing their arm,I would at the least feel obliged to report it.And if in a professional capacity,I would have thought you would be obliged to do the same,if that is the case. Trust me, I take my job very seriously and I do exactly what I'm supposed to. The fact that I am saying that I don't think what he did was comparable to Begley, doesn't mean that I wouldn't take it very seriously if I came across it.
Agreed, and I'm not talking about illegality; what I'm suggesting is that a person's motives in doing a thing are always relevant (hence the distinction between manslaughter and murder!), and a majority on here appear to be happy to assume the worst of Mick. I'm not even suggesting that I believe his assertion as to his motive. All I'm saying is that I won't be rushing to assume the worst.Either way the fact that you say there are many more doing the same thing,makes it no less illegal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?