Confused28
New Member
- Messages
- 3
Hello, seeking some advice!
I’m a public servant and I set up a PRSA AVC almost 20 years ago with Eagle Star, now Zurich. Wasn’t fully aware of the charging structures and the use of “financial advisors”. My policy has a 1% AMC and a 3.5% contribution charge. Not great but could have signed up for worse at the time.
Anyway I’m 20 years out from retirement and over last number of years I’ve become aware of the low cost execution only policies which I have decided to open. No contribution charge and AMC of 0.75%.
When researching in more detail I only today found out it might be a possibility to replace my old policy with the new policy?
Am I correct in my understanding of this? Would the old policy me merged into the new policy and be charged under new charging structure? Is this a way of getting rid of my”financial advisor” that I haven’t had any contact with in 20 years but is still receiving his contribution charges!
I would be investing in same funds as old policy as I’m happy with their performance so no issue there. And I’m also aware I’d be losing the option of drawing pensions down at different times if I keep separate, which again I think I’m fine with.
So basically am I interpreting this correctly or am I missing something? Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
I’m a public servant and I set up a PRSA AVC almost 20 years ago with Eagle Star, now Zurich. Wasn’t fully aware of the charging structures and the use of “financial advisors”. My policy has a 1% AMC and a 3.5% contribution charge. Not great but could have signed up for worse at the time.
Anyway I’m 20 years out from retirement and over last number of years I’ve become aware of the low cost execution only policies which I have decided to open. No contribution charge and AMC of 0.75%.
When researching in more detail I only today found out it might be a possibility to replace my old policy with the new policy?
Am I correct in my understanding of this? Would the old policy me merged into the new policy and be charged under new charging structure? Is this a way of getting rid of my”financial advisor” that I haven’t had any contact with in 20 years but is still receiving his contribution charges!
I would be investing in same funds as old policy as I’m happy with their performance so no issue there. And I’m also aware I’d be losing the option of drawing pensions down at different times if I keep separate, which again I think I’m fine with.
So basically am I interpreting this correctly or am I missing something? Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks