The teachers pension after 1995 is a co-ordinated pension, inclusive of the state pension. Hence it's not the "gold plated" deal that many still refer too. Definitely consider carefully which advisor you chose. I am also a teacher and have heard good reports of PSRA in Maynooth. I have no connection to them or experience of dealing with them but a number of colleagues have recommended them.f you feel that the combination of the State Pension and the teachers pension based on 30 years service isn't enough income in retirement, then you could consider an AVC, yes.
I am teaching in a permanent position for twenty years. I trained as a nurse in the old system and proceeded to work in temporary positions for11 years, inclusive of training which was heavily work based. Ive been told that these years are considered non pensionable service because of some rule pre 1999.
Ive been told that these years are considered non pensionable service because of some rule pre 1999.
I was not in nursing but I think they were certainly wrong in relation to the temporary nursing role, and probably wrong in relation to the training. See this previous thread: https://www.askaboutmoney.com/threa...-to-avc-with-option-to-buy-back-years.222363/The Mater Hospital pensions dept told me that my training and my temporary nursing role..for year... was not pensionable.was she wrong. this is was from 1992-1995..training and 1995-1996 staff nurse.
these years are considered non pensionable service because of some rule pre 1999.
Never buy a product with more than .6% annual management charge (AMC) or less than 100% allocation.
That's true and from what I've read there are even lower AMCs of 0.4% execution only now available. If you're not comfortable making the decision on your own then please do engage a genuine financial advisor. I'm sure Liam is one of those. Just beware that there are a lot (perhaps a majority ???) of financial advisors out there that will charge you north of 1% for their meagre services and land you with a trail commission that will cost you thousands over many years for virtually no service or benefit.OP says that they are ignorant when it comes to pensions etc. So an execution only service would not be suitable. Are there brokers offering advice on product selection and fund selection while offering 100% allocation and 0.6% AMC? I've only seen such charges for execution-only services.
I agree with the first part but not the second part. Unless there's actual misselling there's no scam involved. Just a tied agent who might steer a customer in the direction of a less than optimal product with potentially higher than necessary charges. Caveat emptor. That's why I asked earlier what sort of "financial advisor" is involved here, but the original poster never addressed that point.Never act on financial advice from your bank as that is just a scam.
95% allocation and charges of greater than 1% seem to be the norm throughout the public sector for AVCs; in the civil service, education and health sectors.95% allocation (i.e. 5% commission for no work at all) and trail commissions of >1% per annum
In your situation, a better question would be - Does anybody know a pension adviser who can offer advice about nurses’ pension schemes and how different types of service count? I don't.
My point exactly. You are being taken advantage of and screwed over !!!95% allocation and charges of greater than 1% seem to be the norm throughout the public sector for AVCs; in the civil service, education and health sectors.
95% allocation and charges of greater than 1% seem to be the norm throughout the public sector for AVCs; in the civil service, education and health sectors.
The teachers pension after 1995 is a co-ordinated pension, inclusive of the state pension. Hence it's not the "gold plated" deal that many still refer too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?