Read an extraordinary piece a while back in which the author referred to an investor who on the day the euro came into existence embarked on a twenty year plan to buy the European banking index every day for twenty years
He lost almost 99% of the time
You seem to have completely misunderstood my point.because you chose 6 march 2009 as your starting point, the deepest trough of the worst financial crash since the 1930s as your starting point, thats why. On the surface a 300% increase in S&P500 since 2009 seems dramatic, an 88% increase since year 2000 is not.
but who in reality would have done that nobody, it exaggerates the point that investing in european financials has been a terrible investment for a very long time, any irish investors in irish banks can attest to that. Still some have profited from it like wilbur ross.
Also the point by sarenco of the 300% gain in the S&P since 2009, very few investors would have been buying in march 2009 and probably none of those that did are still invested in the S&P today, they are probably investing in european financials now.
You seem to have completely misunderstood my point.
I never suggested that a return of over 300% since the 2009 trough was particularly dramatic. The point is that the length of this bull market is unprecedented.
You're right, stock market returns since the turn of the century have been pretty underwhelming. But 18 years is not a particularly long time in stock market terms.
I don't.You don't think eighteen years is a long time to be invested in the market ?
You're right, stock market returns since the turn of the century have been pretty underwhelming. But 18 years is not a particularly long time in stock market terms.
I don't see how you could reach that conclusion.thats fair enough, as a result would you be investing in global etfs (ex USA) (like Vanguard world ex USA etf) since the performance has been poor since the turn of the century, you could hardly say you are investing in overpriced assets.
I don't.
Some foundations, sovereign funds, etc. have infinite time horizons - they think in decades, not years.
I'm not sure I really understand your question but I guess it would be reasonable to consider something like 30-40 years to be "long term" in the context of an individual investor's investment horizon.
Over that sort of time horizon, the probability (but not certainty) of stocks outperforming fixed-interest investments becomes fairly overwhelming.
I'm up +25% these last few months thanks to the big market drops but I don't recommend an inexperienced investor try to "time" or short anything. I'm taking calculated risks which aren't appropriate for everyone.
European economy appears to be inches from recession, America more or less carrying global economy
In my view, far too much effort is spent trying to time the market, trying to be too smart with the use of ETFs etc, and focussing to much on costs.
I’ve a very simple strategy:
- Retain 6 months’ worth of net salary in cash spread across two Credit Union accounts
- Max out my pension contributions and my wife’s AVCs; all of the contributions go into Zurich Life’s International Equity fund (0.45% for me, 0.75% for her). We’re going to stay invested in the same fund forever.
- Use any excess cash to pay down the mortgage
That’s it, nothing more complicated than that.
For a little bit of additional diversity at no extra cost, would you not invest your wife's pension into a different fund than yours?
So, the S&P500 reached a new all time high this week - it's up 17% so far this year.
Pretty incredible.
So what happens next? Who knows.
But it might be time to start thinking about taking some risk off the table - it's starting to look very bubbly to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?