I don't think that you have to be of low IQ to be gullible.Its a base business which relies on parting people of low IQ from their money.
So there should be some sort of mandatory test to check if somebody is too gullible for their own good? "Sorry sir - you failed the idiocy test so I am unable to sell you this TV on these credit terms..."?How I feel is it depends how the product is presented. If the consumer can demonstrate they understand the deal they are accepting for themselves then I have no problem with it as its their choice.
Hjrdee, your phrasing/tone implies that 'agreeing with Clubman' might be a rarity!
I don't think that you have to be of low IQ to be gullible.
So there should be some sort of mandatory test to check if somebody is too gullible for their own good? "Sorry sir - you failed the idiocy test so I am unable to sell you this TV on these credit terms..."?
IFSRA and/or the Consumer Credit Act I would presume. Don't credit rates need to be cleared with IFSRA? When the rate charged is greater than 23% APR then the lender must register with IFSRA as a [broken link removed].Whats to stop these companies making the interest rate 1 million percent and sending the bailiffs around the next week ?
In my opinion morals have nothing to do with this (i.e. are off topic) as they are a subjective and personal matter.At what point in your view does an interest rate become immoral if at all ?
Something can be legal yet immoral or immoral yet legal. They are not mutually exclusive terms.
In my opinion morals have nothing to do with this (i.e. are off topic) as they are a subjective and personal matter.
But i couldn't help but feeling for this person,
If your told about it and still avail of it, you have little grounds to complain!
IFSRA and/or the Consumer Credit Act I would presume. Don't credit rates need to be cleared with IFSRA? When the rate charged is greater than 23% APR then the lender must register with IFSRA as a [broken link removed].
In my opinion morals have nothing to do with this (i.e. are off topic) as they are a subjective and personal matter.
Not quite! Its just most people are blaming the stores for offering these interest rates and not blaming the people for taking them up. If you have people prepared to €6,000 for a tv on credit at 29% you can hardly blame the shop for offering it.
How aggressive in practice? I can't imagine many situations in which a "no" or "please go away" would not deal with such a problem.
How aggressive in practice? I can't imagine many situations in which a "no" or "please go away" would not deal with such a problem.
Which is surely a personal and subjective issue?A subjective and personal matter is an individuals interpretation of the definition of whats moral but the type of morality which seeks to nanny us is not what I am talking about.
My definition is the difference between whats right and whats wrong
Not quite. The terms & conditions should be written down clearly and made available to the consumer in advance of them signing some sort of credit agreement. I don't believe that somebody (e.g. a sales assistant) should necessarily be tasked with explaining these to them. It is up to the consumer to read them and seek clarification if necessary.as CM correctly states it's not a rip off if the person who applies for such a loan has the terms and conditions explained to them.
Why are you unsure about your point and why do you think that 20%+ is unreasonable? Why not 19.5% or 10%? Surely once a credit provider and their agents operate within the relevant laws/regulatory framework (e.g. providing suitable terms & conditions/explanatory material) then they should be allowed to charge whatever price the market will bear?the main point I guess is the fact that I think 20+% interest cannot be justified as 'reasonable' for any line of credit, thats all.
"Sorry sir - you failed the idiocy test so I am unable to sell you this TV on these credit terms..."?
"Sorry sir - you failed the idiocy test so I am unable to sell you this TV on these credit terms..."?
Which is surely a personal and subjective issue?
We could get into an existentialist discussion here but life is too absurd for that sort of carry on.Well some concepts like stealing may not appear wrong to a tiny minority of people but I was conservatively referring to a dictionary definition of right and wrong
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?