I have seen that rationalisation as well. The money was lent in good faith by a friend to a friend with no doubts about it being returned. But then the borrower's spouse got involved and decided that there were higher priorities than repaying the loan.I’ve actually seen this done by people and seen it blow-up. The borrower runs into trouble and then starts to act the maggot. And he or she rationalises it on the basis that the lender “has loads of money”.
The lender could always get a pound of flesh as collateral for the loan like Shylock in The Merchant of Venice...Money and friendship. As Shakespeare said, "neither a borrower nor a lender be"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?