By any chance have you a copy of the contracts. The small print? The letter of offer.
Two things niggling me, that you can't repay early and that you've to pay future interest if you repay early
Hi BrendanI advised the 4 children to buy the mother's house for the outstanding balance on the Life Loan and then there would be no penalty
How did you copy paste from the PDM, I couldn't manage it?
Here's the break fee. (and I've learnt a new skill today tee hee)Hi Brendan
Life loans (or any other form of consumer mortgage) can ALWAYS be partially or fully paid off ahead of schedule without penalty.
The European Union (Consumer Mortgage Credit Agreements) Regulations 2016 explicitly provides that a consumer has a right to discharge fully or partially his or her obligations under a credit agreement prior to the expiry of that agreement.
In such cases, a lender is entitled to "fair and objective compensation, where justified, for possible costs directly linked to the early repayment, but shall not impose a sanction on the consumer, and any such compensation shall not exceed the financial loss of the creditor."
In other words, any break fee imposed cannot penalise a borrower.
In other words, any break fee imposed cannot penalise a borrower.
the brochers clearly state you are to discuss the loans with you children and to make a will etc.
That is why I sent the brochure to the programme.
A person has a right to borrow money without discussing it with their children.
But BoI recommends to them that they do.
The Bank can't go any further. Imagine the furor if a lender sought a statement from each of the children to say that they did not object to their parents borrowing money.
Brendan
Understood Brendan but a lot of people think of break costs as a penalty which leads them to make incorrect financial decisions.I use the word "penalty" loosely. I mean a break fee.
She obviously had a completely different loan product to the other 3,000+ customers...And if it had been a week later the bank would have taken the entire house worth 300K. I don't understand any of this.
a lot of people think of break costs as a penalty
Case Study - Deirdre
Mother borrowed 30K. Money used to do some jobs on the house. Now deceased. They paid it off 70K, 5 years ago, with Deirdre's husband pension. And if it had been a week later the bank would have taken the entire house worth 300K. I don't understand any of this. Entire pension was used.
Case Study - Deirdre
Mother borrowed 30K. Money used to do some jobs on the house. Now deceased. They paid it off 70K, 5 years ago, with Deirdre's husband pension. And if it had been a week later the bank would have taken the entire house worth 300K. I don't understand any of this. Entire pension was used.
Complete nonsense. It's hard to know whether she was out and out lying or whether she misunderstood the bank official or the bank official misunderstood the issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?