Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,691
and if any changes are appropriate.
Revenue did a review of the taxation of US domiciled ETFs and simply removed the assumption that these ETFs were liable to CGT. Caused a massive amount of confusion.I would expect that it will be changed.
I doubt that they would do a review if it were not intended to change it.
Brendan
From what I gather, the Revenue are still trying to get to grasp on the taxation of funds and ETFs bought on platforms and outside of life companies.How do you do that for ETFs when they don't seem to have a grasp on the extent of what ETFs are bringing in? Would it not be an administrative nightmare?
Gerard
www.bond.ie
I presume that there will be a public consultation on it and we can all give them the benefit of our wisdom on the topic.
Brendan
The refunds on life assurance policies happen at the next chargeable event (8 year anniversary, withdrawal or death). ETFs would be the same, but with the punter having to calculate the amount of the refund (as is currently the case where they fall in value following an 8 year payment).I think their job would be a lot easier if they knew exactly how much they were collecting via ETF self-assesed deemed disposal/exit tax. For this reason I'd have my doubts on the Summer 2024 Report/Review end date.
They have a smooth system for Life Assurance Exit Tax (it has it's own tax head in their receipts figure) but The declaration of dividends/gains from ETFs, and the associated tax take, cannot be separately identified from these returns, since the relevant fields include dividends/gains from sources other than ETFs.
My understanding is that if the tax rate was to reduce on life assurance exit tax then in force policies would be due refunds, calculated and added back to their plans by the product providers.
How do you do that for ETFs when they don't seem to have a grasp on the extent of what ETFs are bringing in? Would it not be an administrative nightmare?
Gerard
www.bond.ie
The refunds on life assurance policies happen at the next chargeable event (8 year anniversary, withdrawal or death).
Closed
They had 337 submissions and I'd say the vast majority of those were from individuals who buy ETFs
Paschal announced the review in the last budget.
I'd say they got alot more submissions to this than they ever got before for any other financial submission relating to investments or funds. Therefore they can't ignore all these small time investors and only listen to the big financial firms like they usually doClosed
They had 337 submissions and I'd say the vast majority of those were from individuals who buy ETFs
Paschal announced the review in the last budget.
Therefore they can't ignore all these small time investors and only listen to the big financial firms like they usually do
The life assurance companies just show the refund amount on their systems and statements, the refund hasn't actually taken place until a transaction occurs. It's the same for ETFs, but the individual needs to go to Revenue for the refund.That's not how it works at the moment where exit tax was paid on a partial encashment and the vlaue of the plan fell subsquently. The tax refund is added back to the plan immediately. I don't see why a drop in the tax rate would not also be able to be added back immediately to an in force plan and that the life assurance companies system can cope with this.
Gerard
www.bond.ie