Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,683
Of course, the opposite is true as well. When Clery's closed down, we didn't lose 460 jobs. They were just moved around - to the likes of Arnott's, Brown Thomas and other high street retailers.
In Lidl's case, I would expect the replacement rate to be poor, as a highly-automated selling operation is effectively replacing a host of smaller more labour-intensive competitors.
Can you save me the walk and tell me what my conclusion would be?Walk around any Dunnes Stores and compare staff levels to Lidl/Aldi!
Efficiencies in the economy reduce costs for all of us. That means a lowering of the CPI and a reduction in the cost of living. That's good news for the economy and population in general. Paying someone to do an unnecessary job amounts to the same thing as that person being paid to be on the dole.Hi Brendan
I'm not arguing anything, in fact I really like and admire Lidl.
I'm just observing that if (for argument) each new Lidl shuts a few corner shops, the greater efficiency of the Lidl operation may well mean a net loss of jobs overall. But on the other hand if the corner shops manage to stay open, albeit at lower trading volumes, the marginal staff losses there would be outweighed by the extra jobs in Lidl.
Dunnes seem to have the hoardes from The Walking Dead working for them.Can you save me the walk and tell me what my conclusion would be?
I particularly liked the Waterford whispers headline - 3 injured in rush as 2nd till opens in local Aldi !!
Both Lidl and Aldi pay well above going pay rates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?