My partner was working for a company part time up until September of this year. In September they informed her that her regular hours, Friday and Saturday were no longer on offer. The general manager gave her 2 options,
She is now 1 month from giving birth and asked the company to sign her maternity benefit forms. However the general manager told her that she had been left go in September and her P45 was processed then! On saying that this was impossible as she had worked for them in November, and informing him of what they had agreed previously my partner was informed that there was an assumption that that was "off the books". There is no question that could have been the case. It was my partners sole aim to remain employed to enable her to claim maternity benefit when the time came she had absolutely no interest in an under the counter job. Remaining on the books and employed in some form or other was of paramount importance to protect this entitlement, she would not be entitled to it if unemployed at the time of going out on mat leave. Working off the books was never ever in the equation, nor was it ever mentioned.
On calling the revenue it turns out that the P45 was indeed processed in September. My partner was however never informed she was being left go or never received a copy of this P45.
The way I see it we are now facing 2 problems -
There is a lot of "he said she said" here and very little hard evidence apart form the fact my partner worked for the company in November. I am not sure what our options are. Any help or advice would be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
- Take her P45 and look for another job
- Stay on the books and do relief and cover work which would be available.
She is now 1 month from giving birth and asked the company to sign her maternity benefit forms. However the general manager told her that she had been left go in September and her P45 was processed then! On saying that this was impossible as she had worked for them in November, and informing him of what they had agreed previously my partner was informed that there was an assumption that that was "off the books". There is no question that could have been the case. It was my partners sole aim to remain employed to enable her to claim maternity benefit when the time came she had absolutely no interest in an under the counter job. Remaining on the books and employed in some form or other was of paramount importance to protect this entitlement, she would not be entitled to it if unemployed at the time of going out on mat leave. Working off the books was never ever in the equation, nor was it ever mentioned.
On calling the revenue it turns out that the P45 was indeed processed in September. My partner was however never informed she was being left go or never received a copy of this P45.
The way I see it we are now facing 2 problems -
- My partner is not eligible for maternity benefit as she is not employed
- My partner has claimed illness benefit from the social welfare which she would only be entitled to if she was employed, now it turns out she was employed and therefore not entitled to this payment.
There is a lot of "he said she said" here and very little hard evidence apart form the fact my partner worked for the company in November. I am not sure what our options are. Any help or advice would be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance