The Horseman
Registered User
- Messages
- 724
You suggested this was for private tenants. Why would a landlord engage in a scheme like this when he can re rent a property easily enough.Property owner leases to Co. Co. for the 5 or 10 years. Co.Co. puts in tenant, that's the difference.
Encourage new entrants into the market. The greater the supply the more choice the tenant has.
Property owner leases to Co. Co. for the 5 or 10 years. Co.Co. puts in tenant, that's the difference.
That would be the case under the current system, I believeactually its minimum ten years , anything less and the landlord is in charge of the tenant
I agree. The present regulations are set to discourage even more property owners.Encourage new entrants into the market. The greater the supply the more choice the tenant has.
Agree with this; it has to be made quicker and easier to remove tenants for non-payment or anti-social behaviour.Speed up the eviction process,
Don't agree here; I've no problem paying tax on the income I earn.extend the rent a room relief to landlords. This reduces the amount of rent tenant needs to pay and at the same time allows them save for a mortgage.
It has nothing to do with the tax you pay. If you extend the rent a room scheme then the tenant pays less rent and can save for a deposit.Don't agree here; I've no problem paying tax on the income I earn.
I don't think giving more tax relief to property owners will reduce rents; what will reduce rent is more susupply.
Did you mean the tenant, not the property owner?If you extend the rent a room scheme then the tenant pays less rent and can save for a deposit.
Extend it to the landlord. If rent over certain amt then tax is due on all rent.Did you mean the tenant, not the property owner?
If so, it already applies to tenants.
Expecting the Government to give the tenant and landlord a tax break on the same property and be against the Government building extra houses nice I like it,Extend it to the landlord. If rent over certain amt then tax is due on all rent.
It also allows the tenant save for a deposit for a house purchase.Expecting the Government to give the tenant and landlord a tax break on the same property and be against the Government building extra houses nice I like it,
They might be doing them a favor by seizing them, I own and let out two propertiesthe way things are going here , there is more chance of BTL properties being seized than changes to allow swift eviction of rogue tenants
So your proposal is more tax relief for the property owner which you believe will reduce rental costs; and tenants are sure to save money for a deposit rather than spend on holliers and nice clothes.It also allows the tenant save for a deposit for a house purchase.
And the starting point is how to keep the rental market going.There are more reasons than hard to evict why landlords are leaving the business,
Dance halls might have been replaced with night clubs, but people still go to them and spend money there.getting out of a buy to let might be like getting out of the dance hall business forty years ago,
as already pointed out they already get tax relief and first time also get a grant, not to mention the cost of HAP,It also allows the tenant save for a deposit for a house purchase.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?