Their spouse is a middle manager in the Civil Service which means a decent income and guaranteed job security. They're currently saving over €1k monthly anyway. A €25k emergency fund is pointless and they should dump that into the mortgage or pension.Don't do anything else bar an emergency fund...
That scheme is basically awful. They should be dropping as much into their AVCs as you if they want to have any hope of retiring before 66.Spouse civil service pension, post 2013 scheme. 7 years contributing so far. Started paying €100 per month to AVC this year also
No risk=no reward. That also applies to your pension investment.I am risk averse so would prefer to increase pension contributions...
Why? You live near colleges and will still be working when the youngest is in college so you don't really need a college fund. If it's to set the kids up later in life then the credit union is the wrong place to put it- it's bleeding to death via inflation.20,000 saved for children in Credit union
Agreed.Forget about the investments, your pensions are the real risk
Family home value: 540000
Mortgage on family home: 208000
Annual gross income : 74k (private sector)
Annual gross income of spouse/partner: 68k (public sector)
Cash: 25,000 savings account earning practically no interest
20,000 saved for children in Credit union
Probably because that’s where the commission is.as the financial advisor was really pushing the investment option rather than ploughing more into our pensions.
What kind of "investment advisor"? Post after post here on Askaboutmoney refer to "financial advisors" but seldom do people clarify what kind.Good to get alternative view points as the financial advisor was really pushing the investment option rather than ploughing more into our pensions
That's one of the last places, along with most other social media platforms, that I would look for a financial advisor.a strong presence on instagram
How did she justify this? In particular instead of maximising pension contributions. It doesn't seem like sound advice based on previous comments here.Rather than increasing the pension contributions outlined above she recommended looking at long term investments in equity funds.
Maybe. But you need to be aware that it belongs to the child and they can access it at 18 but it's totally inaccessible until then, and it's not possible to change the fund choice after starting.Are Zurich’s child saving plans worth considering for our child benefit?
What do you mean by "balanced advice"? If you mean that they recommended investing your pension in low to medium risk/reward funds/assets then that is also likely to be bad advice.At the work presentation they gave balanced advice regarding pensions and investments so I felt confident going with their service.
That doesn't make sense given the significant tax advantages of saving through a pension - tax relief on contributions, tax free growth while invested, tax free lump sum on drawdown.and felt looking to equity funds would yield a better outcome
Good!But I’ve read over so much of the money makeover advice over the last while and other information online which made me question her approach.
Given the ages of your children you should also consider investing directly in equities given the lower charges and tax compared to unit linked funds.I’ll take a look at Zurich’s plan, sounds like it might be an option for our child benefit.
Same thoughts here.That doesn't make sense given the significant tax advantages of saving through a pension - tax relief on contributions, tax free growth while invested, tax free lump sum on drawdown.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?