I think the Greens want this. Things like this are the biggest risks to NAMA in my opinion. Political interference will destroy it. It should be run on a purely commercial basis. Anything that does that not generate a return to the taxpayer should not be built.
I think the Greens want this. Things like this are the biggest risks to NAMA in my opinion. Political interference will destroy it. It should be run on a purely commercial basis. Anything that does that not generate a return to the taxpayer should not be built.
NAMA assets shouldn't be used for social purposes just because they are NAMA assets, but if a genuine need for social housing arose, and a NAMA asset could fulfil that need, it would make sense to use the NAMA asset if cost of writing down that asset was lower than replacing it.