Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,766
I thought I had done a key post on this but I can't find it. Is this a correct summary?
If you are an employer setting up a pension fund for employees, you should consider both options.
If you are an ordinary employee with a choice of joining your employer's scheme, then this will be relevant to you.
If your employer contributing to a defined benefit or defined contribution pension scheme, that will usually always be better than a PRSA.
If you are a 5% director, there are other options and this guide is not appropriate to you.
PRSAs
The big advantage is that you can put the proceeds into an ARF.
In general they are more flexible.
The tax-free lump sum on retirement is 25% of the fund
There is an option to do a Self Administered PRSA (through Custom House Capital)
Occupational Pension Scheme
Can be cheaper. On a nil commission basis, the charges are 101% allocation + .75% annual charge vs. 100% allocation and 1% annual charge for a PRSA.
An employer has no effective limit on an Occupational Pension Scheme, whereas the combined contribution to a PRSA is limited to, say 20% for an employee aged between 30 and 40.
The big disadvantage is that, under current rules, the employee must buy an annuity on retirement.
At retirement, the tax-free lump sum is 1.5 times final salary.
If you are an employer setting up a pension fund for employees, you should consider both options.
If you are an ordinary employee with a choice of joining your employer's scheme, then this will be relevant to you.
If your employer contributing to a defined benefit or defined contribution pension scheme, that will usually always be better than a PRSA.
If you are a 5% director, there are other options and this guide is not appropriate to you.
PRSAs
The big advantage is that you can put the proceeds into an ARF.
In general they are more flexible.
The tax-free lump sum on retirement is 25% of the fund
There is an option to do a Self Administered PRSA (through Custom House Capital)
Occupational Pension Scheme
Can be cheaper. On a nil commission basis, the charges are 101% allocation + .75% annual charge vs. 100% allocation and 1% annual charge for a PRSA.
An employer has no effective limit on an Occupational Pension Scheme, whereas the combined contribution to a PRSA is limited to, say 20% for an employee aged between 30 and 40.
The big disadvantage is that, under current rules, the employee must buy an annuity on retirement.
At retirement, the tax-free lump sum is 1.5 times final salary.