This arose because of an FSPO case which demonstrates teeth.
[However, the FSPO and the understanding of contract law is suspect but not in this case]
https://www.courts.ie/acc/alfresco/...-b9d04caf961a/2023_IEHC_234.pdf/pdf#view=fitH
What exactly was the FSPO ruling?
@Lightning, does WizardDr's link provide your answer?
I have read the High Court judgement.If one was to complain to the FSPO, I wonder if outcome would be different? The person that brought that case was awarded 1K plus the outstanding interest.
You did very well, if Friday night only cost you €75Thought it was a load of nonsense but welcomed the cheque for €75, especially as I was going out on Friday night!!
You did very well, if Friday night only cost you €75
Got the cheque for €50, then lost it. Can't find it anywhere. Had to ask for a new one.
Is this taxable?
IT IS yeeaahhtaxable?
Taxable in what way. Is it classed as income. I received a number of refer a friend bonuses too. Could it not be construed as a gift?IT IS yeeaahhha
Just cannot understand this as same customer may receive duplicate check 100€ in total, whereas others just 20€ and even worse others none as their account was opened before 2019 as the guidelines explainIt gets better:
Hello there,
I just registered myself on this forum for this matter.
I acknowledge receipt by post mail KBC BANK Good Will bank cheque 50€. There is a sad part for this as follows.
When I tried to lodge this bank cheque onto another bank account, there is a massive 31€ bank fees deducted from 50€ good will cheque. The bank located outside Ireland in my home country Greece.
I have inquired about this transaction fees but neither KBC nor domestic bank admits such a fee lumpsum. Instead they would say that there must be a third party that imposes such a fee for the transaction to be successful.
Would you have any idea about this?
https://www.askaboutmoney.com/threads/kbc-goodwill-cheque-cashing-conundrumKBC have responded, if the cheques are returned with written instructions, they will re-issue them in the name of a third party.
Excellent point. The bank somehow has disclosed some important information against the customers who fell victim to such a policy. Thus in order to disguise this matter, it returns some trivial money back to them. There may be an issue of deliberate breach of confidentiality to the expense of customers.Hmmmm…..
Interesting.
When a bank issues an overly lengthy worded form of apology (or non-apology, as the case may be), accompanied by a cheque, it usually masks a more fundamental issue.
Or breach.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?