Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,723
Judge rules bank entitled to repossess home despite not agreeing 'more sensible' terms
ptsb got an order for possession in July 2015. They had appealed it to the High Court. They still got a 6 months stay.
"He also said they had failed to face up to their insolvency and he was urging them to get “good advice from a Personal Insolvency Practitioner.
This would be preferable to relying on others who had told them to advance 30-40 points in their High Court case which were “just nonsense”, the judge told Sharon Mallon, representing herself."
The judge said he was critical in his judgment of PTSB but he must implement the law and had no jurisdiction to make comments concerning fairness or otherwise.
While he considered a long-term arrangement was what was required, the bank did not want to do that, he said. In the circumstances, he told Ms Mallon he was urging her to get good advice and not advice from people telling her to advance 30-40 points which were “just nonsense”.
ptsb got an order for possession in July 2015. They had appealed it to the High Court. They still got a 6 months stay.
"He also said they had failed to face up to their insolvency and he was urging them to get “good advice from a Personal Insolvency Practitioner.
This would be preferable to relying on others who had told them to advance 30-40 points in their High Court case which were “just nonsense”, the judge told Sharon Mallon, representing herself."
The judge said he was critical in his judgment of PTSB but he must implement the law and had no jurisdiction to make comments concerning fairness or otherwise.
While he considered a long-term arrangement was what was required, the bank did not want to do that, he said. In the circumstances, he told Ms Mallon he was urging her to get good advice and not advice from people telling her to advance 30-40 points which were “just nonsense”.