You will have the 13 contributions to be able to possibly re-qualify. Whether you actually re-qualify depends on whether you meet the other conditions, including having sufficient PRSI contributions.
You will have the 39 paid or creditted contributions in 2009 (JB credits until June 09, and signing for credits for the rest of the year).
You will not have the 13 paid contributions in 2009. However you will have them in another relevant year (current tax year)
You appear to have suffered a further substantial loss of employment.
Actually in your case, its probably not a re-qualification case, but a completely new claim as your claim is separated by more than 26 weeks from your last one. In any event, the conditions for eligibility are the same.
You should therefore qualify for Jobseekers Benefit. As you have no paid contributions in 2009, you will qualify at the minimum rate (84.50 plus any increse for spouse/children)
If you waited until January to make your claim, your claim would be based on your 2010 contributions. If you only worked 4 weeks or so (ie December) in 2010, then your Benefit would be based on your average over those 4 weeks, so you may well be eligible for a full payment of 188 plus any increases due, provided that your average earnings were over 300 Euro.
Thanks very much for the note.I didn't get any salary in Dec 10 only started getting paid in Jan 11 back dated so I didn't make any contributions in 2010 so based on your reply I doubt you could use the 4 week avg
But your PRSI contributions will be dated January, as that's the period that you worked for them.
You will have the 13 contributions to be able to possibly re-qualify.
You will have the 39 paid or creditted contributions in 2009 (JB credits until June 09, and signing for credits for the rest of the year).
You will not have the 13 paid contributions in 2009. However you will have them in another relevant year (current tax year)
Just one final question the 13 paid weeks. I would have them in 2010 would those together with the 39 credited in 2009 not be sufficient to get the full entitlement? the social security web site does states that you can use these????? AND OTHER YEARS
*If you do not have 13 paid contributions in the relevant tax year, you must have paid 13 contributions in any of the following years:
Based on the verbiage use it would seem that I would get full entitlement or am I missing an important point?
- The 2 tax years before the relevant tax year (PROBABLY USED THEM LAST TIME I CLAIMED?)
- The last complete tax year (2010 I signed for credits)
- The current tax year (2011 I would have them here)
You have the 39 credited in 2009 and the 13 in a relevant year, that's grand. But that doesn't determine the rate you get paid.
No matter what year your qualifying contributions were made, the rate depends only on your average earnings in the GCY (General Contribution Year), so if you claim in 2011, it is based on your average in 2009, if you claim in 2012, it is based on 2010.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?