Jobseeker allowance discourages people to find work?

D

davegaa

Guest
Folks, first time poster here, I was interested in what people thought about yesterdays statement by the OECD, suggesting that people on certain jobseekers allowances and unemployment benefit are not encouraged to go out and find a job.


Obviously everybody's situation is different, what do people make of it?
 
I overheard a woman saying the other day in local shop she turned down part-timework due to her FIS payments.....she had thought the employer was goin to pay cash.
 
http://www.welfare.ie/EN/Pages/unemployed.aspx

Weekly Jobseeker's Benefit payment in 2011:

Average weekly earnings Personal rate Qualified adult rate
Less than €150 €84.50 €80.90
€150 - €219.99 €121.40 €80.90
€220 - €299.99 €147.30 €80.90
€300 or more €188 €124.80


188 pw for most people.
 
Jobseeker Allowance rates from January 2011

Jobseeker's Allowance maximum rate for people aged 25 or over

New and existing claimants Personal rate Increase for a Qualified Adult Increase for a Qualified Child

Maximum rate €188 €124.80 €29.80



Jobseeker's Allowance maximum rate for people under 25 years of age Age

Personal rate Increase for a Qualified Adult
18 - 19 €100 €100
20 - 21 €100 €100
22 - 24 €144 €124.80
 
I think the problem is not with the recently unemployed but with the long term unemployed. There is a certain % of the LTU who will never work or want to. It is not only JSB but accomadation payed for and other benefits as well.
I would personally step down the payment maybe 10% every 6 months ensuring their is the incentive to go out into the workplace.
Being no jobs out there is a bit of a problem also
 
Dont forget rent suppliment. It is paid in addition to the €188 per month. The Dublin couple with 2 children rate below would get you a nice 3/4 bedroom semi-d in a middle class area (€1,050 p/m).

So the couple with 2 children essentially gets a nice semi-d to live in and €188 plus €124.80 plus 2x€28.90 = €370.6 per week for food/bills. When rent allownace is included, its equivalent to €32k year of take home pay. And this does not include all the other benefits e.g. medical card. The country cant afford to be paying people this amount of money not to work.



Maximum rent per monthCountySingle person in shared accomodationCouple in shared accommodationSingle personCouple with no childrenCouple with 1 child or one-parent with 1 child Couple with 2 children or one-parent with 2 childrenCouple with 3 children or one-parent with 3 childrenCarlow €260€300€468€500€600€650€660Cavan €195€200€368€400€450€500€510Clare €220€260€407€450€550 €600 €650Cork €285€290 €468€610€705€765 €800Donegal €235 €240€368 €455 €500 €550 €560Dublin - Fingal €350€390€529€770 €930€1,000€1,050Dublin - other local authorities €390€400 €529€800€930€1,050 €1,100Galway €255€260 €468 €550€700€750€760Kerry €235€240€407€500€550€640 €650Kildare€320 €325 €485€600 €750€850 €900Kilkenny €260€300€468€520 €600€650€665 Leitrim €190 €200€368 €390 €400 €450 €500Limerick €255 €260 €446€500 €605 €650€700Laois€235€240€407 €485 €550€590 €600 Longford €195€200 €345€350 €400 €450 €500Louth €285 €286 €468€529 €600€685 €700Mayo €220 €225 €450 €455€550€600€610 Meath€260€265 €468€550 €650 €700 €750 Monaghan€195 €200€368 €390€500€540€550Offaly€220 €240€407 €485 €550 €590 €600 Roscommon €190 €195 €370 €375 €450 €500€520 Sligo €220 €240€407 €485 €540€550 €600Tipperary North €260 €265 €407 €450 €550 €640€655 Tipperary South€250 €255 €468 €455€555 €645 €650 Waterford€270€280€468 €470€550 €650 €660 Westmeath€220 €260 €407€450€550 €590 €600 Wexford€260€300 €468€520€600 €650 €660Wicklow€315 €325 €529€710 €850€900 €910
 
Yes, the 188 pw for a single person on JSB or JSA is not the biggest problem.

It's the non-cash benefits that cause the unemployment trap.
 
I am also an employer and cannot get any one to work part time because they would lose their benefits.
I believe the Job seekers allowance should be handed over to employers to take people on.
This way unemployed people will be upskilled and trained and employers like me who may not be able to take people on now can.
If i paid the equivalent of the JSA to the eployee as well they have a full salary and as the situation improves could take the person on full time
 
According to the examples circulated at the budget, a similar couple with one earner earning €55k per annum would only take home €29,600 per annum.
 
Some int'l comparisons (2007 OECD data):

NB: UI = JSB

AUSTRIA

9m of UI at 55% of former net wage, max 14750 pa

BELGIUM

UI paid with no time limit, 60 / 50% of former gross wage

No dole, as UI lasts forever

DENMARK

UI for 2yrs at 90% of former wages, max 24k pa

JSA / dole = none in Denmark

FRANCE

UI paid for 23 months at 57-75% of former wages.

JSA = 100 pw

GERMANY

UI paid for 12m at 60% of wages

JSA = 359pm = 83pw

USA

UI paid for 26-99 weeks at 50% of wages, up to 450 USD pw.
 
I was laid off just before Christmas last year and I had a queue of lads in the local pub advising me how to stretch out my time on the dole for as long as possible. Most of these guys have been out of work since the building industry started to go belly up in general and have had no issue in being int he pub 4/5 nights per week and financing their lifestyles.

A lot of them are living with their parents and claiming full rental allowance.

There's is also the trend of couples living together but not getting married because they'd lose the unmarried mother's allowance.
 
It annoys me as a self employed person when trying to keep my company afloat i see on a daily basis certain long term unemployed outside the pubs and bookies spending my hard earned tax.
What annoys me even more is if i was to go belly up in the morning i would not get a penny in assistance.
 
It appears that the impending property tax will exempt welfare recipients adding a further disincentive to work.
 
Most of Government expenditure is on social welfare and health. Both these systems need to be tackled head on to reduce costs and eliminate inefficiencies. Cuts in other services can only generate small change in comparison with these two areas. I do not sense any appetite from Government to reform social welfare - all we've seen to date is token cuts around the margins. While the banking situation may have plunged us into crisis, the failure to tackle these areas will kill us off totally.

People who have worked and paid social insurance should be entitled to a % of previous taxable income for a set period of time and this should be paid out of the social insurance fund (thus being cost neutral). Those who dont and wont work should be on much lower rates, if anything at all. There should be no 'means testing', rent allowances and other add ons which generate costly administrative work - if you are unemployed, you get a set amount full stop.

Strange thing is that, as any political analyst will confirm, long term unemployed people generally dont vote and most are not even registered to vote. So tackling this issue will not lose votes.
 
Speaking as a social welfare recipient I have no problem with reform and cuts.
As a family where both parents work and both earn a good income we still receive €7’500 a year in non-means tested tax free welfare.
I find that crazy.
I also find it crazy that the state pumps tens (hundreds?) of millions propping up the rental market through rent relief/rent allowance. This money creates a floor in the rental market that protects landlords from enduring the real market rate. In effect it is a direct subsidy to landlords.

While benefits that unemployed people get are certainly a disincentive to work there are other areas of the welfare system that also need to be reformed as part of an overall review of the entire welfare structure. In that context I’d be all for a system that links benefits to former income levels and then steps down to a lower long-term rate over a few years.
 
nediaaa said:
I am also an employer and cannot get any one to work part time because they would lose their benefits.
I believe the Job seekers allowance should be handed over to employers to take people on.
This way unemployed people will be upskilled and trained and employers like me who may not be able to take people on now can.
If i paid the equivalent of the JSA to the eployee as well they have a full salary and as the situation improves could take the person on full time
Click to expand...

The problem then is companies have no incentive to hire people not being paid by the Govt. Which is exactly what has happened with the current WPP scheme. Its being abused by employers.
 
I can never understand this anomaly:

Most normal, reasonable people would support the idea of generous short-term income and other supports for the unemployed, but also declining support for those longer-term unemployed who don't engage in training, education, jobs, etc.

Yet no politician seems to support it???
 
High cost of living, is a problem. The idea of a staggered reduction from a % of previous salary seems reasonable. It doesn't help there are simply no jobs.
 
Protocol said:
I can never understand this anomaly:

Most normal, reasonable people would support the idea of generous short-term income and other supports for the unemployed, but also declining support for those longer-term unemployed who don't engage in training, education, jobs, etc.

Yet no politician seems to support it???
Click to expand...

Our parish pump politicians spend a huge proportion of their working week running 'clinics' at which a high proportion of 'clients' are work shy social welfare recipients looking for the local TD to exert some pressure to continue their welfare payments, get them more money or get them additional payments. So you can understand why the average TD is given the mistaken impression that the majority of Irish people want extra benefits for long term social welfare recipients.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top