Wasn't there something in the news today about them clamping down on this and requiring everybody to sign on every month or something?(c) Signing Arrangements It is for the local office to decide how often the person must sign this declaration, where and at what times. A person may be disallowed for failure to sign on.
Persons who receive payment by way of Postdraft/EFT are reminded of their signing day the week before they are due to sign.
Where a person fails to sign on his/her signing day and has still failed to sign by the next payment run date, payment is suspended on the computer system and the next payment does not issue.
If the person contacts the Local Social Welfare Office and payment for the week in question has been generated, s/he is questioned as to why s/he didn't attend on the appointed day.
Where a Deciding Officer is satisfied that the person still satisfies the statutory conditions for Jobseeker's Benefit, the payment suspension is removed and payment will issue. If there is any change in the payment amount, the unemployment pattern is amended before the payment issues.
Regular failure to attend on the appointed signing day may result in loss of payment.
Wasn't there something in the news today about them clamping down on this and requiring everybody to sign on every month or something?
This sounds wrong. I would imagine that most PAYE workers are on Class A PRSI which provides for certain non means tested benefits including JB once a specific history of contributions exists. Self employed Class S PRSI however only covers long term (e.g. pension) benefits. In many cases PAYE workers will qualify for non means tested PRSI linked Jobseeker Benefit.There was an interesting discussion on Job seekers benefit on Matt Cooper this evening, which I only caught the end of. They seemed to be saying that a lot of PAYE and Self-employed people won't be eligable for any payments, as they are means tested
There is no longer anything called UB. It is called JB and is PRSI linked. Jobseeker's Allowance however is means tested.They were obviously discussing the difference between Unemployment benefit and Job seekers benefit earlier but I missed it.
The discussion WAS around self-employed (non PAYE) not qualifying for Jobseeker's Benefit (PRSI linked) adn having to apply for Jobseeker's Allowance which is means tested. The point was being made that this is the consequences of the construction industry employed a lot of sub-contractors (i,e self-employed, looked after their own tax/PRSI, etc), rather than direct employees in recent years.
Thats sounds like it alright, they were referring specifically to self-employed guys in the construction industry.
I know some PAYE people currently being means tested too (spoke to thewm about it just yesterday), they were told they'd have to have savings/investments of less than 30k to qualify for any sort of payment. One is due 10 weeks UB (or JB, not sure which) now.
Presumably because they don't have sufficient PRSI contributions to qualify for non means tested JB and had to apply for JA?I know some PAYE people currently being means tested too
There is no such thing as UB any more. It's now called JB and being a benefit is PRSI linked and not means tested. Presumably you actually mean Jobseeker's Allowance which is means tested?One is due 10 weeks UB (or JB, not sure which) now.