Chris
What pensioner over the age of 70 has the risk profile to make decisions on investments?
Most senior citizens want to know where their cash is, that it is safe and they can access it anytime.
A person of 82 years is not going to make the same decisions or investments that one in their 40's would make nor should they be advised on the maturity of their investments to invest again. Cash is King at the end of the day.
IMO there should be a hands off advising senior citizens to invest in risky markets, currencies and products. Investing when you are working and earning is different to managing what you have when you retire.
I've been reflecting on this conversation Chris, and I have to say your talk of currency 'investment' for OAP's is codswallop. On ANY timescale.You are looking at a 3 month window!!! That is trading NOT investing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck
How long do you think would be appropriate?
Years, not months.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck
I have no problem in re-visiting this in another 3 months and we'll see again what's happened. But for the moment - the pensioner has lost money thanks to Jill.
6 months is still a trading time frame. And unless Kirby, or anyone else here, advocated a pensioner invest ALL their funds in foreign currency or denominated assets, a loss (and lets face it, a miniscule one at that) on these is completely irrelevant for a 3 month time period. If you look at the actual numbers for the two currencies you mentioned then you'll notice that one has offset the other:
EURAUD 12/5: 1.4127 yesterday: 1.4477 (=-2.4%)
EURCHF 12/5: 1.4031 yesterday: 1.3749 (=+2%)
Well, that's where we disagree.I've been reflecting on this conversation Chris, and I have to say your talk of currency 'investment' for OAP's is codswallop. On ANY timescale.
In fact I seriously question the notion of moving savings around as anything more than an act of folly for any but the professional speculator.
Yes, for a pensioner having some funds in foreign currencies or equities would be more in line with hedging. But how is this a bad thing?!?!?Forex is NOT investment - it is HEDGING at best. And the timescale is utterly irrelevant, unlkess you have a crystal ball telling you exactly what global events will do to currency exchange rates in the next 3 - 6 -9 or 12 months, or whatever you say is a safe 'investment window'.
Daytraders make decisions in minutes or hours, but not all currency speculators are daytraders; days, weeks and months are very common time frames. Yes it is a dangerous ground, but only if you intend on jumping in and out of the market even on a timeframe of several months.As the man said - sh1t happens - and when it does, the currency markets are the fastest to reflect changed perceptions because they are the most liquid. Forex speculators SHORT currencies, and get in and out in minutes or hours - not months. Hedgers take a longer term bet on a risk assesment which is normally counterweighted against the market cost a product or service they are trading overseas. This is dangerous ground for the unwary or foolhardy.
Well, that headline may as well read "Euro recovery, approaches 1.60". Today's exchange rate is about 1.32.
This is exactly why you shouldn't be looking at any short time frame, which is what I keep saying!!! Apart from that, I never said I had some high hopes for the USD, quite the opposite, I agree that it is toast, but so is the Euro, since the ECB is going down exactly the same road as the Fed. This is reflected in theThis what I mean. A few short weeks ago the US speculators were busy talking of a euro implosion, and rapid parity with the USD. Now - trhey're on the run, having been badly burned. The light is dawning that (in spite of your high hopes) the USD is NOT a safe haven any more. They're even driving the Yen to a 15 year high against the USD today! The USD is TOAST. The only thing that can save it now is a war - and who knows, maybe we'll get one.
The only advise I'd give to anyone worrying what to do with large EUR cash holdings in Irish banks is - open an account in France or Germany and send it all there - in euro.
It'd be a bad thing if they considered it an 'investment'which is what you called it.Yes, for a pensioner having some funds in foreign currencies or equities would be more in line with hedging. But how is this a bad thing?!?!?
Currency SPECULATORS?? I thought this was about protecting SAVINGS?Daytraders make decisions in minutes or hours, but not all currency speculators are daytraders; days, weeks and months are very common time frames. Yes it is a dangerous ground, but only if you intend on jumping in and out of the market even on a timeframe of several months.
I understood you to term USD a 'hard currency' while saying the EUR is not? The point I'm making is that the USD is weakening (check the Yen rate) and the EUR is strengthening, contrary to Jill Kirbys forecast. And the EUR is not going down the same road as the Fed because the EU has not applied quantitative easing to the humungous levels the US has. The bailout package may never be spent. Its a ready weapon, which will be used to beat on the speculators if they want it.I never said I had some high hopes for the USD, quite the opposite, I agree that it is toast, but so is the Euro, since the ECB is going down exactly the same road as the Fed.
No hedging is not some complicated game for some professionals. It means reducing the risk, in this case on part of a portfolio. Diversification is the simplest form of hedging against an outright loss on one asset class.It'd be a bad thing if they considered it an 'investment'which is what you called it.
Hedging - thats a whole other game, and not one for amateurs.
You are misunderstanding my point. You mentioned speculators with a time frame of minutes or hours. All I said was that speculators have time frames from minutes to months. Investors have time frames of several years! not a couple of months. Protecting your wealth when you need it over a 10+ year time frame does not mean that you are speculating in currencies!!!! Many pensioners put all their assets in Irish bank shares because it was believed to be a safe place. Putting all your eggs in one basket is never a good idea, and the goes for advising that pensioners keep all their assets in the Euro.Currency SPECULATORS?? I thought this was about protecting SAVINGS?
I would highly recommend anyone reading this discussion to just put the term 'Forex Trading Forum' into Google and read some of the forums you'll find. They're an eye opener.
On the USD we actually agree; it is not a hard currency, but neither is the EUR or the GBP. The EUR has strengthened against the USD, but that is hardly some great feat of an achievement. Yes I agree the EUR is a better currency than the USD, but it is not a hard currency, there are far better and stronger currencies. Yes, what the ECB has done so far is not quite as bad as the Fed, but it has made unlimited funds available to banks and is buying junk bonds.I understood you to term USD a 'hard currency' while saying the EUR is not? The point I'm making is that the USD is weakening (check the Yen rate) and the EUR is strengthening, contrary to Jill Kirbys forecast. And the EUR is not going down the same road as the Fed because the EU has not applied quantitative easing to the humungous levels the US has. The bailout package may never be spent. Its a ready weapon, which will be used to beat on the speculators if they want it.
Yes, and at the same time a large part of the rest of the euro zone is running huge trade deficits. And the fiscal deficit policy is also offsetting the gains of German, not EU in general, exports.German manufacturing is leading the EU recovery. The nouveau riche of China and the Far East have a big appetite for quality cars and consumer goods which Germany and (through them) the EU will supply.
AgreeThey still make things in the EU that the world wants to buy.
AgreeThe US makes less and less every year - except weapons!
Disagree, there may be a short term boost against the USD, but not against countries that are not plagued by monetary and fiscal incompetence.The EUR is the hedgeing currency of choice - just watch it soar....
If anyone has an idea on what currency to hold if the USD were to collapse, I'd love to hear it.
The euro was trading at $1.20 and Jill was confidently predicting parity soon. The euro now trades at $1.37.I heard Jill Kirby on the Derek Mooney show on RTE1 this afternoon.
There was a discussion on personal finance where she referred to people having large sums on deposit losing 10% in the last few months due to the euros drop in value. She said this had cut the 'spending power' of cash in bank accounts by 10%.
The euro closed on Friday at $1.32, in June this year it was $1.19. How do these guys keep their jobs?Neil Callanan Sunday Tribune today said:euro falls to two year low against the dollar
Isn't that strange?How do these guys keep their jobs?
Isn't that strange?
From what you'd read here on AAM, anybody in the private sector who breaks wind in the wrong place gets immediately fired, whereas those wasters in the public sector are constantly breaking wind in their customers' faces, and can't be fired.
No, Chris - You're missing the point again - presumably deliberately.That is not an accurate representation of some of the public sector criticism. In the private sector there is choice, if someone farts in your face, to use your apt analogy, like the Sunday Tribune does, then I can ensure that none of my money goes to them (unless of course the government decide to give the Tribune some money). Other people may like the smell and fund the paper with their money, not mine. This is why the Tribune is struggling to get less than 5% of Sunday readership.
When a public sector employee or service farts in the face of its customers, there is no way to turn off the funding tap directly by the customer.
Isn't that strange?
From what you'd read here on AAM, anybody in the private sector who breaks wind in the wrong place gets immediately fired, whereas those wasters in the public sector are constantly breaking wind in their customers' faces, and can't be fired.
Do you promise to come out with the same 'any chance we can stay on topic' request every time someone launches yet another off-topic attack on the public sector here on AAM?This is a good thread with some IMO, very interesting and informative posts. Any chance we can stay on topic?
No, Chris - You're missing the point again - presumably deliberately.
We have read on AAM about this fetish for firings the private sector - as some people seem to think that firing is the only way to manage the performance of staff. I just wanted to make the point (yet again) that this whole 'divide and conquer' approach is a nonsense. There is no such thing as a public sector person or a private sector person. We're all just people - good and bad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?