S
I know there are principles involved but the pain of having to pay 2 months penalty will be a lot less than having your credit rating affected. Put it down to experience and never sign anything without thoroughly checking the facilitiies and terms and condition again?
This may sound like rolling over I know but weigh up principle versus future bad credit rating.
In my amateur opinion you can't just walk away from the contract and not expect to be charged the penalty.
I could certainly envisage a court siding against the consumer if it was obvious that they unilaterally breached the contract without even making their complaints known (in writing preferably) to the establishment. Cahir and friend seem to have the right approach. I suspect that just walking away from the contract is the wrong approach and leaves one open to liability for any early termination penalties outlined in the contract.While that obviously applies in 'normal' circumstances surely there are circumstances when the customer is entitled to rip up the contract when the service provided is nothing like what was advertised? I heard the Joe Duffy programme on the place in question and it really was astounding, I can't imagine any court in the land not supporting the right of the customer to cancel their contract in light of the hygiene problem .
I could certainly envisage a court siding against the consumer if it was obvious that they unilaterally breached the contract without even making their complaints known .
I ceratinly can - for example if the customer didn't take steps to explain why the other party had breached the contract and they (the customer) simply tried to walk away expecting the other party not to enforce any penalty clauses.I can't imagine any court in the land not supporting the right of the customer to cancel their contract in light of the hygiene problem
Er... let me try again...
I ceratinly can - for example if the customer didn't take steps to explain why the other party had breached the contract and they (the customer) simply tried to walk away expecting the other party not to enforce any penalty clauses.
Depending on the specific sutuation it could be hard to objectively and verifiably prove that some "hygiene problems" outweighed the successful delivery of all other contractual obligations by the service provider to the extent that "the services provided bore no relation to those promised in the contract". The original poster does not clarify but if, for example, they used the gym for a period of months before deciding that they wanted to prematurely terminate the contract then it might be difficult to prove that "the services provided bore no relation to those promised in the contract".if the services provided bore no relation to those promised in the contract one would surely stand a pretty good chance of winning a case against the establishment.
Oh, I don't know Clubman,........
......
........C'mon Clubman, perhaps, for once, it's time to take the side of the wronged consumer, rather than the business. No one would think less of you, honest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?