JA - same sex relationship means tested?

B

Betty boop

Guest
Hi, am unemployed, same sex partner working full time. When they do the means test for JA will a same sex couple be treated the same as hetero couple? On welfare.ie states :co-habiting couple: acting as "man and wife" everywhere. Thanking you.
 
Yes, a same-sex couple are treated the same as a hetero couple for SW purposes. There has been debate on other threads about what is taken into account when defining co-habitation. There is no definition in law for it. SW use the following (for 'husband and wife' you can read 'same sex couple' for your purposes):

LIVING TOGETHER as husband and wife:
1. CO-RESIDENCE
2. HOUSEHOLD RELATIONSHIP:
- FINANCES SHARED
- DUTIES SHARED
Living together AS HUSBAND AND WIFE:
3. STABILITY
4. SOCIAL
5. SEXUAL

See this for more explanation
 
I'm loth to disagree with Welfarite, who's normally very well informed on these things, but this is not accurate. Same-sex couples are treated as individuals under the social welfare code. The legal term "living together as husband and wife" (which is in the Social Welfare code) applies to opposite sex couples only.

In fact, the full term used for a variety of social welfare purposes, is "'spouse means [...] a man and woman who are not married to each other but are cohabiting as husband and wife."

See, for example, subsection (10) in this link:
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2005/en/act/pub/0026/sec0003.html

There is an ongoing exercise in the Department of Social and Family Affairs on equality proofing the social welfare code, and this is obviously liable to change.
 
Last edited:
Dreamerb, I was under the impression that same-sex couples were treated as cohabitating for SW purposes (there is no legal term for cohabitation). But if you say otherwise, I can't argue as I have no evidence of which way is correct....!

Any examples out there of experiences of same-sex couples being treated as individuals under SW rules?...
 
Last edited:
jaybird said:
It does repeatedly mention man and woman in the text, it doesn't provide for a same sex relationship. On the other hand, there is nothing in the text to specifically exclude same-sex relationships. There must be a ruling somewhere though?
Click to expand...
The legislative definition (at the link I provided) is very clear - it says "a man and woman who are not married to each other but are cohabiting as husband and wife.". That is not and cannot be interpreted as including a same-sex relationship.
 
Welfarite said:
Dremerb, I was under the impression that same-sex couples were treated as cohabitating for SW purposes (there is no legal term for cohabitation). But if you say otherwise....

Any examples out there of experiences of same-sex couples being treated as individuals under SW rules?...
Click to expand...
100% confident! It is liable to change consequent on DSFA's current exercise, but there's so much to be changed that it's dragging very slowly...
 
Dear all, thank you for that, very helpful and just goes to show that there is alot of work to be done on the equality front as yet.
 
You are joking, isn't it better for social welfare to be treated as two individuals rather that a couple. I have no problem with social welfare treating a same sex couple as a married couple if they can get all the benefits available in the tax code and under inheritance laws etc.
 
Related info: some survey (can't remember details, on Today FM news this morning) apprently yielded that the majority of Irish people (I think it mentioned 6/10) are in favour of same sex marriages.
 
I think it would be nice to have the choice to be seen as a couple if you are in a loving, same sex relationship. There are a lot of people trying to get equality, but I doubt it will happen anytime soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top