Hi, I need some advice please.
A relative died intestate over Christmas last and I am the sole beneficiary.
The only asset is a house, which was in extremely poor condition.
I got a local EA to give me a valuation of the house as it was on the date of death.
Following discussions with my solicitor and accountant, who didn't advise against it, I decided to go ahead and renovate the house, which I now have done at a cost of approx. 80K.
Now, my having accepted an offer, the solicitor is saying that the selling price should be the value for probate, not the valuation at date of death, which means I can't claim the 80K expenses.
I understood that there would be in effect two transactions, the first to deal with probate and CAT, the second to deal with the sale of the house and CGT.
Has anyone come across this situation before?
A relative died intestate over Christmas last and I am the sole beneficiary.
The only asset is a house, which was in extremely poor condition.
I got a local EA to give me a valuation of the house as it was on the date of death.
Following discussions with my solicitor and accountant, who didn't advise against it, I decided to go ahead and renovate the house, which I now have done at a cost of approx. 80K.
Now, my having accepted an offer, the solicitor is saying that the selling price should be the value for probate, not the valuation at date of death, which means I can't claim the 80K expenses.
I understood that there would be in effect two transactions, the first to deal with probate and CAT, the second to deal with the sale of the house and CGT.
Has anyone come across this situation before?