20 billion it is, but that's a drop in the ocean given that 5 trillion is now invested in irish domiciled funds and 1 trillion of that is ETFs but a miniscule proportion of that is irish investors.Hang on, theres 20 billion invested by Irish people in ETFs ?
That must be a typo... maybe 20 million.
Do 'poor' people not have money on bank accounts?Which, to be fair, is true.
The well off who are paying for pretty much everything, the politics of envy.My gut feeling is any measures they take will be seen as only benefiting the more well off and thus get criticised on Budget day.
Poor people only have money in bank accounts. Having enough spare cash to be looking at investments means you are not poor.
so should taxation policy be designed only to favour those who live pay cheque to pay cheque?Poor people only have money in bank accounts. Having enough spare cash to be looking at investments means you are not poor.
Money in a bank account is still an investment. Probably not a good one, but still an investment.Poor people only have money in bank accounts. Having enough spare cash to be looking at investments means you are not poor.
This is the worst bit. It's not as if there isn't any taxes where this has already been a factorEspecially when they found the EU wouldn't allow it.
At the risk of recreating a famous Monty Python sketch... my household income is zero (or, technically, negative) these days.My household income is below the mean, but I own some shares and ETFs.
For some (many?) people, the only cash in the bank is day to day cashflow.Money in a bank account is still an investment. Probably not a good one, but still an investment.
But why should that derail the whole review, that should only have been a small adjunct to the reform of the exit tax regime. The EU is not stopping them abolishing exit tax or bringing in an ISA. I think this is them using excuses to stall and obfuscateMy guess is the unhelpful suggestion of Minister McGrath(?) in trying to make this an investment in Irish startups wasted the time of everyone involved in the decision making. Especially when they found the EU wouldn't allow it. I'm happier there's no scheme than that dumb idea.
incredibly short sighted and symptomatic of the general poor financial literacy in this country.
That's fairly damning alright but I'd imagine a lot of them have them in their spouse's name to avoid being labelled a "fat cat" investor and such just because they hold a few units of a Vanguard ETF.I'd argue that it's more to do with the financial illiteracy of TDs
Have a scroll through the register of interests to see how many TDs do not hold Shares, EFTs, Life Assurance Investments, AVCs, ARFs, State Savings,
Previous and Current Minister of Finance hold none.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?