N Newbie! Registered User Messages 895 12 May 2015 #1 As per question above, are these the same documents? We have the folio but the title deeds was were referenced by the bank.
As per question above, are these the same documents? We have the folio but the title deeds was were referenced by the bank.
M mf1 Registered User Messages 4,450 12 May 2015 #2 No. A copy folio is only part of the title deeds. It is however absolute evidence of ownership. "but the title deeds was were referenced by the bank." No comprende mf
No. A copy folio is only part of the title deeds. It is however absolute evidence of ownership. "but the title deeds was were referenced by the bank." No comprende mf
N Newbie! Registered User Messages 895 12 May 2015 #3 mf1 said: No comprende mf Click to expand... My bad grammar or the sentence?
M mf1 Registered User Messages 4,450 12 May 2015 #4 What does this sentence mean? "but the title deeds was were referenced by the bank" mf
N Newbie! Registered User Messages 895 12 May 2015 #5 Sorry, I just reread that and what I should have said was that the solicitor has asked us to request the title documents from the from the bank as it can take up to 6 weeks.
Sorry, I just reread that and what I should have said was that the solicitor has asked us to request the title documents from the from the bank as it can take up to 6 weeks.