I read that as 1) military defence spending as not being productive - in other words, the US will dispose of old military stock, typically by dropping it on some unfortunate country that is not on the same page.
2) 'combined with' being the critical part of the comment.
I agree it's taking hold.The sentiment of fiscal stimulus is taking hold in the developed world, would you agree?
Perhaps not yet in Ireland, but we usually follow at some point.
I do agree.The concept of fiscal stimulus in the articles I have listed is to reward labour over capital. Would you agree?
I read it differently. I read it that "military and infrastructure spending" as it stands, i.e. each one being separate. The comments are in reference to Trump who wants to beef up the military, engage on massive infrastructure spending and reduce corporation taxes. These 3 items are being referred to by Bill Gross.
I do agree.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, as a qualified mechanic, he is relatively low paid €14ph. With rent and childcare etc there is not much left over. He is a good lad, 27, would love to buy his own home but it is out of reach.
The vast majority of businesses like that make small profits and spend the vast majority of their income on wages.I was talking about the setting up of a business, like a factory for instance. I borrow a million and then out of that I hire you to look after IT requirements. If the business crashes I go bankrupt and leave a tab for others to pick up. You can claim state redundancy. If the business works I keep lions share, do whatever to avoid paying taxes and keep your pay rise to a minimum.
It was very left wing.By a left-wing government? Yes? Or no?
Again, it was very left wing.Left-wing governments, again?
We have continued to borrow money to fund day to day expenses. That’s hardly austerity.A combination of taxes and cuts has been the austere policy for 6-7yrs
Agreed.Im not disputing that the economy is growing. Im disputing the manner in which it is growing. It is being propped up on unsound economic money printing policy designed to create, in Draghis words, "a wealth effect", so that we can start our borrowing spree again.
The State being the employer of last resort, i.e. employing people for the sake of it. We did it here in the 70’s.What on earth could he mean by being the employer of last resort?
My guess is he is advocating fiscal stimulus (hopefully in a productive way) that will result in a transfer of wealth from capital to labour.
They are but much of it is to do with inefficient processes.We constantly hear how public sector workers are over-burdened, so I don't think reducing numbers further would be sustainable.
Take Sweden or New Zealand. Both are much better run. Both have better public services. Both have much fairer income tax systems and a generally broader tax base.firefly theBigShort pick a country Lets say Germany seeing they helped bail us out . Benchmark Ireland to services to Germany services or any other country for that matter . Do we want and are we prepared to pay to have them. Are we prepared to unwind Everything stopping us from achieving our goals.Lets say pensions public/private. child care .health service. Dole.Housing.
I agree that there has been a general move from a return on labour to a return on capital. It’s happened since the 80’s and early 90’s, mainly since the opening up of South East Asia and a huge increase on capital due to their very low wage costs. On a global level, as per your original post, this has resulted in massive wage increases, just not in the part of the globe where wages were already high.Yes, it goes back the 'how' it should be achieved. No doubt reducing corporate tax can induce an pressure on wages, but the benefit will predominantly felt in higher capital returns. This would defeat the purpose.
I would more agree with this sentiment from Bill Gross.
He must be a rubbish mechanic if he’s only getting €14 per hour and not getting any overtime or nixers.
That's a bit harsh!That is a really dumb ignorant comment I have to say. You dont know anything about the man.
You don't know for instance that he lives in small provincial town from a farming background where he also works on the family farm. You don't know that he is a committed footballer, hurler and cyclist (his accident was a nasty fall in mountain bike event) and gives his time to volunteer in his community in various ways.
He is committed to his family and his community. If that means foregoing 'the market rate' for his skills so be it. Life is not just about the climb up the greasy pole to higher incomes and serious illness cover, is it?
That's a bit harsh!
If someone makes choices which limit their ability to earn a higher income that's their own business.
Still a bit harsh though.Doesn't mean they are rubbish at their job though, does it?
Still a bit harsh though.
You don't know for instance that he lives in small provincial town from a farming background where he also works on the family farm. You don't know that he is a committed footballer, hurler and cyclist (his accident was a nasty fall in mountain bike event) and gives his time to volunteer in his community in various ways.
He is committed to his family and his community. If that means foregoing 'the market rate' for his skills so be it. Life is not just about the climb up the greasy pole to higher incomes and serious illness cover, is it?
Unfortunately, as a qualified mechanic, he is relatively low paid €14ph. With rent and childcare etc there is not much left over. He is a good lad, 27, would love to buy his own home but it is out of reach.
This will probably be considered harsh also...You don't know for instance that he lives in small provincial town from a farming background where he also works on the family farm. You don't know that he is a committed footballer, hurler and cyclist (his accident was a nasty fall in mountain bike event) and gives his time to volunteer in his community in various ways.
He is committed to his family and his community. If that means foregoing 'the market rate' for his skills so be it. Life is not just about the climb up the greasy pole to higher incomes and serious illness cover, is it?
Giving a small part of the story and then attacking someone who draws conclusions based on that portion which you gave is indeed very harsh. If you are posting a hard luck story then give all the facts before you get all precious about it.Yes, assuming somebody is rubbish at their job based solely on their income level is indeed very harsh.
That must be a really dumb ignorant comment too.People are free to choose how to spend their time and I'm glad we live in such a society. The mechanic in question is obviously committed to his community and that's great. Plenty other people are too though who also have a higher income. 14 euro an hour for a mechanic is quite low I would have thought. Given his farming background and rural location, perhaps he could specialise in farming equipment or something. He may well choose to work the same hours as he currently does but his rate could be higher.
It's not just a bit harsh, it's a really dumb ignorant comment.This will probably be considered harsh also...
Childcare costs and a home is out of reach? Maybe he should have prioritized a house before having the child if that's what he wanted.
No insurance, a child to pay for and he's out mountain biking and breaks his leg? Maybe he should stick to something a little less dangerous given his precarious financial situation.
Giving a small part of the story and then attacking someone who draws conclusions based on that portion which you gave is indeed very harsh
Giving a small part of the story and then attacking someone who draws conclusions based on that portion which you gave is indeed very harsh. If you are posting a hard luck story then give all the facts before you get all precious about it.
In normal circumstances if a mechanic is only earning €28'000 a year then he or she isn't much of a mechanic. If there are other reasons why they are on such a low income then include those reasons when bringing it up.
I took all of the information you had given and drew a conclusion. You then moved the goalposts.Thats exactly what you did. You took a small element of a story and automatically attacked the persons ability and skills based solely on their income level.
That's not attacking them, it's just suggesting they do what other people do who want to earn more.Its not a first, you are consistent in attacking people on low incomes, that they should upskill, or they get the 'market rate' they deserve.
Yes, if I was better at my job it may not have happened. That's the real world for you. I can't go on strike and picket reality.Funnily, when talking about your own 45% pay cut, it has nothing to do with you being rubbish at your job, or is it?
Maybe he should have prioritized a house before having the child if that's what he wanted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?