Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,770
You are quite happy to "gamble" on the other thread, but you need more than 20 companies to invest in?????
You would be paying only 20% income tax + USC/PRSI on the dividends so it should be a lot less than the 41% exit tax.
Brendan
41% versus 33% is 8% which is hardly peanuts!theres not that much in it 33% CGT v 41% exit tax ... but with the dividends reinvested you are not paying tax on this yearly so you are gaining this dividend compounding tax free till 8 years so it has to be worth something .
41% versus 33% is 8% which is hardly peanuts!
Plus the first €1270 of a capital gain is exempt and previously incurred losses can also be offset.
Also I don't think you avoid tax by reinvesting dividends - you still need to declare and pay tax on them as far as I know.
You have twice talked about reinvesting dividends tax free - this is wrong as far as I know.
There is so great wealth of knowledge on this forum this spreadsheet by 3CC is brillaint and saved me making my own
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fmQL4a4MoaKXEQPi_lCrJVcaWqeEZ_3deGnr94QoSq4/edit#gid=2
I don't understand.let the dividends compound before paying tax , I am not saying you are avoiding tax on dividends but you get the compounding effect of delaying the tax payment.
I don't understand.
You have to pay tax on dividends when they are paid - even if they are reinvested as far as I know.
Hi Fella
3CC's spreadsheet is excellent but I think the calculations are based off an exit tax of 36% (it's now 41%) and a marginal income tax rate of 52% (on the basis of what you have written elsewhere, I suspect you have a significantly lower marginal income tax rate). If you adjust these rates (but otherwise make the same assumptions), you will arrive at a materially different result over a 16-year holding period.
My preference for equity investment outside a pension wrapper is a widely diversified investment trust (or, ideally, a dozen or so different ITs). That seems to me to be the best compromise between achieving a significant degree of diversification at a reasonable cost and (relative) tax efficiency.
I agree that investing in a concentrated portfolio of 10-20 individual stocks makes no sense unless you are prepared to put in a very significant amount of research to arrive at a conviction that your portfolio will beat (or even match) the return of the wider market - and even then you have to accept that you could be wrong.
Incidentally, if I was in your position I would still prioritise paying off your mortgage, notwithstanding the fact that you are on a cheap tracker, before investing anything in equities outside a tax-deferred pension wrapper. Totally risk-free return with zero tax complications or investment costs.
Edit: apologies, I've re-read your post and I see that you have re-run the calculations to allow for the change to the exit tax rate. Did you adjust the "dividend tax" rate for your own circumstances?
Hi Sarenco
It is often stated categorically on this site that "investing directly in a basket shares is the most tax efficient way to invest" I don't think its clear cut as I feel people don't take into consideration the fact that your dividends are allowed to grow before you pay tax.
Practically though to reinvest the dividends manually would be expensive most people would not receive a huge amount of dividends and to pay the fees to reinvest and the cost of the spread each time would add up to a lot over time which isin't factored in , lets say you get 100 dividend reinvesting is pointless , you could save it up and do it in one batch but your missing time in the market.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?