In relation to negotiating a 10% reduction after sale agreed, at what stage is this ethically acceptable? What's the very latest point that you could do this? I know it's frustrating for the seller but if its all part of the game, EAs and Sellers have no issue driving prices up way higher and now the shoe is on the other foot, if done at the right time I would have thought the seller faces the choice of taking the reduced offer or going through an equally painful process with another buyer and taking another 3 months, I would imagine many will just want rid of the property, especially ex landlords and executor sales
In relation to negotiating a 10% reduction after sale agreed, at what stage is this ethically acceptable?
This is exactly what happens in a supply shock. Pretty stupid vendor if he didn't seek a higher price.There is a difference between looking for a higher price before any deal has been done and seeking to renegotiate after you’ve ‘shaken hands’. Imagine the outrage if some kind of supply shock occurred and a vendor sought to renegotiate an agreed sales price upwards!
This is exactly what happens in a supply shock. Pretty stupid vendor if he didn't seek a higher price.
Totally agree. My word is my bond. By all means, if I was a vendor, I'd work with a purchaser who ran into bank valuation problems for instance. See if we could work something out. Hell would freeze over before I'd do business with someone who tried to stiff me.I am appalled at people’s attitude to be honest; what ever happened to ‘a deal is a deal’?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?