Allpartied
Registered User
- Messages
- 507
Its really not communism. Its well regulated housing policy, rather than the wild west we have here.The ideal you're describing sounds familiar. It's called communism. It worked in the old Soviet Union and its dependencies. Subsidized high-quality housing was provided for all by the State. Professional teams of electricians, carpenters, painters and plumbers did the preventative maintenance and the communal areas were managed properly by the benevolent State authorities. Millions of desperate refugees flocked from the Western "democracies" to live in this workers' paradise. The East German Soviet satellite state even had to build a huge wall to keep them out!
And of course private landlords were indeed gently run out of the business, and then gently put up against a wall and shot, or gently reallocated living quarters in a compassionate re-education facility in Siberia, where their benevolent KGB warders would help them reflect on the error of their exploitative ways while encouraging them to engage in a spot of healthy, rehabilitative rock breaking.
Neither was there any question of rich wealthy individuals evicting vulnerable families of five so they could acquire a villa in the Algarve, or the Crimea. Unless they were well up in the Party hierarchy of course.
Ah yes, the joys of Communism. What could possibly go wrong?
Who owns it now?You've obviously never been on the receiving end of such a demand.
I was lucky enough to grow up in a well regulated, council owned rental property. It was our home, and still is my mother's home. We had full secure tenancy for life.
It really does make a massive difference to the quality of life.
The council still own it and when my mother passes on, or needs alternative care, it will be used to house another family.Who owns it now?
The council still own it and when my mother passes on, or needs alternative care, it will be used to house another family.
Its really not communism. Its well regulated housing policy, rather than the wild west we have here.
You will find similar housing policies in the Stalinist strongholds of New York, or Germany, or France, or Sweden.
Private landlords are discouraged and large corporations, who get too big for their boots, are subject to strict regulation
Berlin’s vote to take properties from big landlords could be a watershed moment | Alexander Vasudevan
The successful referendum to expropriate the city’s apartments from corporate landlords is a potential template for Europe, writes Oxford University’s Alexander Vasudevanwww.theguardian.com
Just for the record, I do not advocate the execution or gulag style exile of private landlords.
The council still own it and when my mother passes on, or needs alternative care, it will be used to house another family
One of the reasons for the shortage of housing (social and affordable) was local authorities selling off their housing. Not just in Ireland but across Europe. Also not building to replace stocks.
Only 75 local authority houses were built in 2015 - the worst year on record
Last November, Alan Kelly vowed there would 200 council houses built by the end of the year.www.thejournal.ie
If you are talking about REITs, then they have to pass on their profits to the shareholders - and the shareholders have to pay income tax on that so it is not exactly as taxless as you implywhereas the faceless corporations are paying a fraction of that
Rent increases may suggest 'unacceptable level of non-compliance by landlords' | BreakingNews.ie
The latest RTB report, which covers April to June 2021, revealed a national increase of 7 per centwww.breakingnews.ie
Over 90% of private rental homes in Fingal ‘fail inspection’
Private properties reviewed in 2019, 2020 below minimum State standard, council toldwww.irishtimes.com
I mean there will be problems with private rental companies and they need to be closely regulated.
But the strong, personal vested interest of the private landlord is not the same interest as the renter. It is much harder to regulate thousands of individuals , than to regulate well run private companies, councils or housing associations.
If the small landlords are petrified, when rents are the highest they have ever been, then maybe they should all bail out. When a house is sold, it doesn't disappear.Do you want the small landlords to stay on in the market until the Councils and the Stat build enough houses for all these people in receipt of HAP etc? And once thats done then we can run the small landlords out of town?! Are you upset that these faceless corporations wouldn't have been interested in house you, your family or your mother? Are you jealous of small landlords and wanting to push them gently out of the market so that you can get a house perhaps?
The private companies may have a role to play and, it is my experience, that they are far more professional when it comes to implementing simple repairs, or upkeep, or secure tenancies. Most landlords regard the property as their house, which they have generously allowed you to rent, until they decide to kick you out.You have some flawed thinking in your argument. From my experience, professional corporations renting out properties do so at the top end of the market. They charge the maximum rent possible and leave units vacant and release in small tranches to the rental market to ensure demand is high and so is the rent. These corporations are not interested in the lower end of the market, which is, again in my experience where a lot of these small landlords that you want to gently push out of the marketplace. Who will house these families and individuals paying in a lot of instances well below the market rent for such a property?
With the state bodies struggling to collect rent, they have been most influential in trying to pass this off to the private sector.Maybe, we need a little more intervention from the state, instead of this blind faith in the market.
You've obviously never been on the receiving end of such a demand.
I was lucky enough to grow up in a well regulated, council owned rental property. It was our home, and still is my mother's home. We had full secure tenancy for life.
This is, indeed, the core of the problem. Private landlords, may be petrified, but with rents at record highs and prices still rising, renters are even more scared.
Maybe, we need a little more intervention from the state, instead of this blind faith in the market.
Rory Hearne: Why is Nama not being used to address housing emergency?
The failure to use land owned by Nama to resolve the housing crisis is a failure of government policy, writes Dr Rory Hearnewww.irishexaminer.com
Only if the shareholders are Irish tax residents and in the main they are not. Alot of the REIT funds come from foreign pension funds.If you are talking about REITs, then they have to pass on their profits to the shareholders - and the shareholders have to pay income tax on that so it is not exactly as taxless as you imply
Really?! How bloody dare they?! Imagine paying for an asset and regarding it as your own. What planet are you on?!Most landlords regard the property as their house
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?