Gee, if it was such a great idea, why do 'the boys' want to pass it on to the general public... Any Irish REIT would be highly concentrated in a minor European economy and as such would not be suitable for most investors seeking to build a broadly diversified portfolio.
If these gentlemen were referring to investing in Irish stocks, then their conclusions are not as far of the mark as you are suggesting! There is a world of a difference between investing in say the S&P 500 and investing in the Irish stock exchange!
Is there a functioning market? I really don't think so. Given the amount of property being held back and the difficulties in funding, I find it hard to see how any conclusions on the Irish market can be anything be but speculative...
Yes, perhaps my point on the S&P 500 was a little trite. The ISEQ Index remains 60% down from its peak and there are two lessons investors can learn from this experience;
(i) That concentrating on a small peripheral market is not necessary and that geographic diversification makes sense (and is easy to achieve, in the stock market at least).
(ii) That the ISEQ suffered above average losses due to the fact that the banks went bust
This latter point highlights that if an individual wishes to invest in individual companies he/she must be able to distinguish between temporary declines in prices (which is normal in a recession) and the threat of a permanent loss. In 2008, the threat to the Irish banks was insolvency and to investors a permanent loss.
Many Irish companies have recovered fully and more - Kerry, Ryanair, Glanbia etc. Although they, too, suffered in 2008 they did not contain the risks of a permanent loss. In my own book (Chapter 8), I argue that most private investors cannot make this critical distinction - between temporary declines in prices and the threat of a permanent loss - and for that reason they are far better off investing in risk assets through funds.
Unless you can identify and understand the three risks in businesses, then how can you ever see the risk of a permanent loss coming? Those three risks are;
(i) The business risks
(ii) The financial risks
(iii) The valuation risks.
Indeed, vanity and egos play their part. Most private investors should not expect of themselves to be able to determine risk, and therefore my own conclusion that most private investors are better off in funds. I do believe this is any admission of failure. Rather, it is to recognise that if we are to benefit from the superior returns on offer over the long-term from equities or property we must survive the downturns and we can better do that if we control the risks.
In physical property, the error Irish investors made was using debt (financial risk) to buy an overvalued asset (valuation risk).
Rory Gillen
Founder, GillenMarkets.com