D
dromroe
Guest
I had a relation who passed away.
She had no will made,and had no assets except for a cash deposit. She had her brother joint on all her accounts in case of emergencies.
She had two brothers and two sisters,all are now deceased except for her brother who is joint on her account and another sister.
Her brother sorted out all her affairs,and on speaking to the solicitor was advised as he was joint on the account he is now entitled to all her funds that were in joint names.
Her brother isnt happy with this as he would prefer to see himself and his sister have the funds split evenly.
Is the solicitor correct to say he is entitled to all the funds,as now it looks like a large tax bill will have to be paid by her brother,who then intends splitting the money evenly between himself and his sister.
If the cash was split between the two as next of kins,the tax liability would be a lot lower.
Can anyone advise ?
She had no will made,and had no assets except for a cash deposit. She had her brother joint on all her accounts in case of emergencies.
She had two brothers and two sisters,all are now deceased except for her brother who is joint on her account and another sister.
Her brother sorted out all her affairs,and on speaking to the solicitor was advised as he was joint on the account he is now entitled to all her funds that were in joint names.
Her brother isnt happy with this as he would prefer to see himself and his sister have the funds split evenly.
Is the solicitor correct to say he is entitled to all the funds,as now it looks like a large tax bill will have to be paid by her brother,who then intends splitting the money evenly between himself and his sister.
If the cash was split between the two as next of kins,the tax liability would be a lot lower.
Can anyone advise ?