Your only real option is legal.I'm not sure what to do about it.
Can he buy out everyone else?My brother has mire or less said he is staying put and not selling the hoyse. My siblings would like their share, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Or if it is worth it. House probably worth about €190,000
How much rent is he paying?My brother has mire or less said he is staying put and not selling the hoyse. My siblings would like their share, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Or if it is worth it. House probably worth about €190,000
I think the point is that the siblings want to access the value that their deceased father wanted them to have. Value that presumably equates to a lot more than your ‘€50 a month’ idea. How the misbehaving brother feels about things is irrelevant. He’s the one causing the strife and he’s the one that needs to move out or buy the OP and the other siblings out. Perhaps as a concession you might, and I mean might, consider allowing him to buy you out over a longer, but not indefinite period, say 3-5 years? These family situations can be dreadful though. Best to park emotion and speak to a solicitor.Your brother is obviously not wealthy but presumably has an income.
One solution would be that he pays a few hundred euros a month rent with an agreement to review in five years.
This number divided by six will not be very much but could do a lot to reduce resentment felt by the rest of you.
To your knowledge what is his income?He is not in a position to buy out the rest of us
If there is a lesson for others out of all of this, never leave a property in your will to be shared between siblings, it is 100% going to cause issues.
Don't be sentimental and completely forget the fact that it was the family home. Always instruct that the assets of the estate be sold and the net proceeds distributed
I know of a family where this was done, and when both parents later died suddenly in quick succession, the mandated immediate sale of the family home and farm culminated in the other siblings having to obtain a court order to force the eviction of the youngest sibling, then barely an adult. The youngest sibling had nowhere else to go and apart from a small inheritance, barely a penny to their name.
To make matters worse, the mandated immediate sale of the property took place when relevant property prices were in deep slump. Had the family been able to wait even a few years before selling up, they'd have at least doubled the sale proceeds.
60 years on, the ensuing family rift hasn't yet fully healed.