I was in Arnotts over the weekend (looking for a good deal in the Bargain Basement!!) and found what I thought was a bargain... a duvet set for with a 25 Euro official price tag placed in a 30 Euro Section.
On presenting it for purchase at the counter, the sales assistant advised me that that price was wrong and pointed to a hard-to-see hand-written (in biro) "30 Euro" price marked on a transparent part of the packaging. She also pointed out that it came from the 30 Euro Section.
I made the counterpoint that the 25 Euro price tag had the Arnotts logo on it and looked like the official price, so therefore under the law they would have to sell me the goods at that 25 Euro price.
She then checked with her manager, and after some consulation decided that they "didn't have to sell it to me at 25 Euro", but would do so to "avoid an argument".
So, my query here is: is the legislation clear on this regarding ambiguous labelling, or does this fall into interpretation withing case law? Are there guidelines that retailers must follow when displaying prices to consumers?
On presenting it for purchase at the counter, the sales assistant advised me that that price was wrong and pointed to a hard-to-see hand-written (in biro) "30 Euro" price marked on a transparent part of the packaging. She also pointed out that it came from the 30 Euro Section.
I made the counterpoint that the 25 Euro price tag had the Arnotts logo on it and looked like the official price, so therefore under the law they would have to sell me the goods at that 25 Euro price.
She then checked with her manager, and after some consulation decided that they "didn't have to sell it to me at 25 Euro", but would do so to "avoid an argument".
So, my query here is: is the legislation clear on this regarding ambiguous labelling, or does this fall into interpretation withing case law? Are there guidelines that retailers must follow when displaying prices to consumers?