Oilean Beag
Registered User
- Messages
- 221
icantbelieve said:There seems to be a new line of thought running through this thread lately on which I'd like a bit of clarification.
To me it appears that people are saying that its perfectly ok for young people who are earning a decent salary to take a large amount of money from elderly people who more often than not have no equity to speak of apart from the value of their house. We're not talking about a couple of grand for a deposit, which is not unreasonable to ask for help with, we're talking about a large chunk of their mortgage.
That not only is this ok but that its also ok to take this money, not because these young people can't afford a home but because they want it in a particluar area and they want it now. They don't want to have to start off a few rungs below where they'd like to be and work towards it in the way that, oh I don't know, their parents did, they want it now.
Even if they paid their parents back they'd only be giving them back the money piecemeal and by the time its fully paid back its only use to their parents is so that they can leave it in their will.
Maybe its just me but I think that people who went through the crappy times in this country when jobs were scarce, taxation was around 60%, third level education cost thousands and mortgages were applied for in a kneeling position should be allowed to enjoy themselves if they find they are in a position to do so.
I don't blame the parents as they will generally subjugate their interests for those of their kids but their kids should have a sense of personal responsibility as well as repsonsibility towards their parents. If people keep going like this then a generation will die never having enjoyed the comforts and luxuries that their kids demand now.
That said, I still hold by my opinion that the rest of us should be grateful that southsiders are prepared to live in kennels that cost a fortune. Could you imagine how much more non southside houses would cost if these people brought their spending power out into the rest of the market. Plus the goverment must be taking a fortune in tax revenues from every hutch sold to these chumps.
icantbelieve said:If people keep going like this then a generation will die never having enjoyed the comforts and luxuries that their kids demand now.
I bet they'd love to hear you call them elderlyicantbelieve said:To me it appears that people are saying that its perfectly ok for young people who are earning a decent salary to take a large amount of money from elderly people who more often than not have no equity to speak of apart from the value of their house. We're not talking about a couple of grand for a deposit, which is not unreasonable to ask for help with, we're talking about a large chunk of their mortgage.
Again I have no issue with that either. There's no reason why you should have to live where someone else says you should. If they want to live somewhere and they can 'afford' it, that's their business and nobody else's. It's a free country.That not only is this ok but that its also ok to take this money, not because these young people can't afford a home but because they want it in a particluar area and they want it now. They don't want to have to start off a few rungs below where they'd like to be and work towards it in the way that, oh I don't know, their parents did, they want it now.
Who says their parents want the money back. God only knows how much my parents spent on me during the time when I was dependent on them, they're not looking for it back. Just like here, there's no rule that says your parents have to stop funding you when you reach a certain age etc. If I was older and had money I'd have no issue giving it to my kids regardless of what age I was.Even if they paid their parents back they'd only be giving them back the money piecemeal and by the time its fully paid back its only use to their parents is so that they can leave it in their will.
Who says they aren't enjoying themselves? It's quite possible they can afford to 'give away' 1,000 pm.Maybe its just me but I think that people who went through the crappy times in this country when jobs were scarce, taxation was around 60%, third level education cost thousands and mortgages were applied for in a kneeling position should be allowed to enjoy themselves if they find they are in a position to do so.
I'm not from Dublin but I'm glad to see the tradition of saying whatever you want in Ireland when it's insulting Southsiders is alive and well. You can say whatever you want about middle class people in Ireland but attempt to make any sort of commentary on other social classes and you'll be shouted down in an instant with cries of elitism etc.That said, I still hold by my opinion that the rest of us should be grateful that southsiders are prepared to live in kennels that cost a fortune. Could you imagine how much more non southside houses would cost if these people brought their spending power out into the rest of the market. Plus the goverment must be taking a fortune in tax revenues from every hutch sold to these chumps.
ludermor said:I have just a query to the people who bought when they were 22. How many of ye went to college. If you graduate from college at 21/22 how could you afford a deposit neve mind a mortgage for a house. If you have been working since leaving cert thenof course you have a few years earnings to bank on, but it is probably to the detriment of future earnings. You will be long enough earning and slogging, enjoy your youth
momomo said:People have different priorties in life, while I am so proud of my beautiful house other people are happy living in other peoples homes and paying their mortgage for them by paying rent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?