I was aware of it. I just wasn't aware of implications. Thanks.So you've been paying Class A PRSI for 22 years but weren't aware of it?
I am teaching since 1991. I took a career break from September '97 to August '98, when I resigned a permanent post and took up a temporary position in September '98. I've had no break in service at all.
I'm hoping that someone here might be able to advise. I am a primary school principal, age 50, hoping to retire at the end of this school year when I will be 51.
How badly would things be affected by taking Cost Neutral at Class A1 compared to D1?.
Anyone got any clever solutions or suggestions?
So it seems you transitioned from Class D to Class A in 1998 and feel you shouldn't have as a pre-95 public service worker. I don't know the ins and outs of eligibility, but I know a bit about how bureaucracies work.
I think it will be a stepp uphill struggle for you to convince the Department of Education that you have been on a post-95 payscale for 22 years but that you should have been on a pre-95 one.
An acknowledgement by them would presumably involve a pretty massive backward correction of pay, tax and PRSI payments. I think the onus will be on you to prove that they made a gross error in putting you on a post-95 payscale paying Class A in 1998. And also why you never made them aware of it until now.
Perhaps, but as Early Riser has pointed out there are other issues.Surely Coyote by being under Class A Paddy will at least benefit from the State Contributory Pension which he would not have been able to access as a pre 1995 teacher?
Hi Páidín I just see this post now and curious as to your outcome
Scope is RTE management's top nemesis. They decide on PRSI Class issues.What is SCOPE ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?